Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OT-How far did this world go into insanity?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OT-How far did this world go into insanity?

    Nothing to do with the usual topics but some of you might have heard about this: the young dutch girl who wanted to do a sail trip around the world.

    The final decision came and I'm outraged. I don't really know if she should be allowed to do it but the reasons given to forbid her and put her under (what truly is) house arrest are insane and unwise. They don't even take time to ask the right questions.

    http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10491181...ound-the-World!

    Of course, this is only an extract but if the decision came through what is described here, I simply don't get it. The only wisdom in this entire text seems to come for a 17 years old british sailor.

    Welcome to our nice Western Dictorial Democracies (One point for the UK, they seem to retain a tiny bit more wisdom than others). Gee, if I ever win the loto, the only decent place to move to could be England or Ireland (I stop recycling now and do everything to help accelerate global warming).

    Okay, I might be overreacting but in case of a twilight war I'll be wishing for soviet victory (at least with them you know who the weirdoes are).

  • #2
    I think it should be up to her parents whether she is allowed to make the attempt. If they approve and that is her wish why not let her I think if any authorities should be involved it is the maritime safety authorities, to make sure the vessel is fully seaworthy and properly equipped, and to check that the girl has sufficient experience and competance in sailing, navigation, first aid etc.
    sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

    Comment


    • #3
      Mmmmm... It seems that people in the Dutch Social Services does not have too much work with the more common problems.
      L'Argonauta, rol en catalĂ 

      Comment


      • #4
        Targ

        You are basically saying what the British boy (who finished his own circumnavigation) was saying. I have to count you among the wise men.
        Saddly, wisdom is becoming rare.

        By the way that girl was born in New Zealand. As a result, a New Zealander is currently under house arrest in the Netherlands under the following charges: being a girl, being socially too young, expressing a strong motivation for something, not hiding her peaceful opinion.

        Of course, everything is done for her own good, in order to show her proper and well balanced exemples coming from adults.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Marc View Post
          Mmmmm... It seems that people in the Dutch Social Services does not have too much work with the more common problems.
          If the Dutch law is similar to that of France (and I'm sure it is), she would, however, be found fully responsible if she goes out assaulting people.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hmmmmmm.. the doc in question has been removed from that site. Perhaps there was some 'in appropriate content' Sounds like censorship in action.

            Comment


            • #7
              I had a long post for this, but decided not to post it since it would probly be seen as a political rant.
              Fuck being a hero. Do you know what you get for being a hero? Nothing! You get shot at. You get a little pat on the back, blah blah blah, attaboy! You get divorced... Your wife can't remember your last name, your kids don't want to talk to you... You get to eat a lot of meals by yourself. Trust me kid, nobody wants to be that guy. I do this because there is nobody else to do it right now. Believe me if there was somebody else to do it, I would let them do it. There's not, so I'm doing it.

              Comment


              • #8
                I'd have to agree, if she wants to do it and her parents are OK with it then Bon voyage! Of course she should need to have comprehensive insurance in case anything goes wrong. There have been a few 'adventurers' in recent times who have screwed up somewhere remote and then called for aid. The local countries then spend very large amounts of their tax payers money to rescue these people who don't pay it back (In fact seeing rescue as their right). They then go on to sell the story and make a load of money out of it. That doesn't seem right.
                I say get insurance or don't expect rescue!

                Comment


                • #9
                  As I said my first reaction was motivated by the elements I could find yesterday. Things have evolved and the elements you can find today are much more different and seems wiser than those given by the media and the web during the last couple of days.

                  It seems, then, that the judicial decision was not intended to stop her project but is in fact intended to evaluate it. That seems indeed wiser and the final decision will be given only in late fall after a report on her capabilities to conduct this project is issued.

                  As a result, I was indeed overreacting or, in fact, reacting to elements that were wrongly presented by both the official medias and reports on the net. It is also possible that the dutch authorities changed their point of view over the last 24 hours.

                  Nevertheless, I'll be interested in knowing the final results on this case and should hope that, this time, the dutch authorities make the whole thing public right away.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Continuing to find information on the subject, it seems that the dutch authorities indeed changed their mind. What made me start this post were the decisions taken on monday during a court forbidden to any public view. This first court ruled to block her, to put her under a 3 month tutelage...

                    A new court took place later this week and took a decision which seems much wiser to me. It ruled to evaluate the project, to put her only under a 2 month tutelage inorder to give enough time for an investigation to be conducted.

                    It seems that the wisdom of Mike Perham, 17 years old sailor who just finished his own circumnavigation (started when he was 16), has been listened to.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I dont get it .

                      Originally posted by Mohoender View Post
                      Continuing to find information on the subject, it seems that the dutch authorities indeed changed their mind. What made me start this post were the decisions taken on monday during a court forbidden to any public view. This first court ruled to block her, to put her under a 3 month tutelage...

                      A new court took place later this week and took a decision which seems much wiser to me. It ruled to evaluate the project, to put her only under a 2 month tutelage inorder to give enough time for an investigation to be conducted.

                      It seems that the wisdom of Mike Perham, 17 years old sailor who just finished his own circumnavigation (started when he was 16), has been listened to.

                      I dont know the case well , but I gather that the Dutch municipal social services has stopped a girl of 13 from setting out to sail around the globe .And that they are conducting an inquiery to see if the girl and her parents are competent to undertake such a project .If they know about the project I personally feel that they are obliged to look into it - if the girl is deemed capable by another capable person and the project is well organized- - then certainly the DutchGov should send her a complimentary lifejacket and stand waving a tearful hanky at the pier .

                      But I dont believe there that such a project would be none of the authorities business.I think I accepth that they would have a legitimate reason to look into it .

                      Mohohender - I liked the point about being fully responsible in case of criminal charges though..funny absurdity .I guess along the lines of being old enough to serve and run a gun into the mountains but not old enough to buy alcohol...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by headquarters View Post

                        But I dont believe there that such a project would be none of the authorities business.I think I accepth that they would have a legitimate reason to look into it .

                        Mohohender - I liked the point about being fully responsible in case of criminal charges though..funny absurdity .I guess along the lines of being old enough to serve and run a gun into the mountains but not old enough to buy alcohol...
                        My first problem came from the fact they didn't call for an inquiry. Then, it seems that they changed that and, therefore, it became more legitimate.

                        Personally, being more of an anarchist, I would love to see the authorities being less involved into these things. The downside to this is that many people are not truly responsible as well.

                        Nevertheless, as the parent representative for our local daycare, I spent 1 full month last year to counter such authorities trying to close that day care on the base of false charges (charges brought by anonymous letter) and that is tiring.

                        The results being the following:
                        - the day care remains open and is entirely cleared of all charges.
                        - tensions among its personnel brought danger to the kids.
                        - the french law currently forbid any authorities to give credits to such anonymous letter (the main problem is that most state authorities consider themselve above the law).
                        - the authorities don't get involved anymore even when we, this time, could need them.
                        - the attack was mostly motivated by the fact that the head authority simply didn't like our type of day care.
                        - they issued a report fully based on the letter and stopped conducting further inquiries (something which would have been more legitimate)
                        - the negative report and its release was motivated by internal tensions among the authorities and should not have ended in our hands in the first place.
                        - I discovered on that occasion that previous investigations by the authority were conducted with little if any wisdom and put the kids in danger, with no consideration for basic security.
                        - the authority finally recognized that they were given advice on things they were not competent with. Saddly, they are allowed to give them.

                        HQ I understand your point but I prefer to remain a responsible anarchist and, unless proven to be myself incompetent, the legal competence of my country stops at my doorstep.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          yeah.

                          Originally posted by Mohoender View Post
                          My first problem came from the fact they didn't call for an inquiry. Then, it seems that they changed that and, therefore, it became more legitimate.

                          Personally, being more of an anarchist, I would love to see the authorities being less involved into these things. The downside to this is that many people are not truly responsible as well.

                          Nevertheless, as the parent representative for our local daycare, I spent 1 full month last year to counter such authorities trying to close that day care on the base of false charges (charges brought by anonymous letter) and that is tiring.

                          The results being the following:
                          - the day care remains open and is entirely cleared of all charges.
                          - tensions among its personnel brought danger to the kids.
                          - the french law currently forbid any authorities to give credits to such anonymous letter (the main problem is that most state authorities consider themselve above the law).
                          - the authorities don't get involved anymore even when we, this time, could need them.
                          - the attack was mostly motivated by the fact that the head authority simply didn't like our type of day care.
                          - they issued a report fully based on the letter and stopped conducting further inquiries (something which would have been more legitimate)
                          - the negative report and its release was motivated by internal tensions among the authorities and should not have ended in our hands in the first place.
                          - I discovered on that occasion that previous investigations by the authority were conducted with little if any wisdom and put the kids in danger, with no consideration for basic security.
                          - the authority finally recognized that they were given advice on things they were not competent with. Saddly, they are allowed to give them.

                          HQ I understand your point but I prefer to remain a responsible anarchist and, unless proven to be myself incompetent, the legal competence of my country stops at my doorstep.
                          I respect that-actually I feel teh same way .(The French mountains have always been hotbeds for anarchy as far as I recall !) .The law of the heart is the only true law.Sadly there are quite a few people that are irresponsible but lets not get into a discussion about who they are !

                          Inside the area of LEX MOHOHENDER you can light up for a cozy evening with this :

                          Grenade Oil Lamp That Spreads Light and makes for a cool looking oil lamp without the major dangerous counterpart of a real grenade.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Mohoender - Dont move to the UK! We are mad here with political correctness and all that crap that is infuriating you. It is I who want to escape from the UK and thought the French were more sensible and I could come there

                            My problem with this case (without having read it beyond a standard BBC news story) is two-fold.

                            1. The psychological effects of the isololation on someone so young - having seen the impact on adults.

                            2. Entrusting parents to know what is best for a child can be flawed - OTT example being those in the US that put young kids into beauty and talent contests or push them in some sports to extremes.

                            So for me (personally, although I hate the nanny state) I think it would be sensible to put an adult tag (16) on solo sailing for beyond a week - but that is purely my take on it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I read in one report about what the girl is planning that she intends to regularly come into port. She won't be spending the entire circumnavigation at sea. If the loneliness started to get to her she could always stop. Some children are much more independent and sensible than others. I was left entirely alone at home for weeks at a time when I was in my early teens and turned out fine. I think if there are no factors that ring alarm bells on the face of it, she shuld be allowed to make the attempt if she isn't being pressured into it and her parents are prepared to let her do it.
                              sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X