Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Favorite T2K-era APC/IFV

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Abbott Shaull View Post
    Yeah that the problem with IFVs. The turret takes up room that could be used by troops. Granted the M113 dismount was full Infantry Squad and going to the M2 it dropped to 7 men or less. Even then one could re-organize the fire team to drop the extra rifleman and still function as a Squad. On the other hand as you add more and more to the IFV the dismounted consisted of Fire Team, and what ever other flavor a unit SOP would use the remainder of them for.
    Abbott,

    If we're looking at a single vehicle operating alone in the context of (say) Kalsiz, then probably a BTR/OT-64 is a great choice due to the large passenger capacity. If you have other vehicles like Humvees or a Deuce present, then space becomes less of a factor.

    Tony

    Comment


    • #32
      Hrm, I agree that if you had but one vehicle, an APC would be better than and IFV for no other reason than beeing able to tote stuff around.

      As far as IFV's go, I had a thought, if you had to pick the penultimate IFV, then the Merkava would qualify! High Firepower, High Protection, High Mobility, and only average troop capacity.
      Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

      Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.

      Comment


      • #33
        You know it always made me wonder with the adoption of the the Stryker Vehicle system. Why they went with Platoons with only basic Stryker, and not mix the platoon with 2 of the conventional Stryker and the other two with more of LAV-25 set up. Giving the platoon better fire-power.

        Granted the Merkava and their APC version would make a great team. Adding two of the APC version with platoon of Merkava with dismounts would give you a full dismount infantry platoon.

        Comment


        • #34
          It's worth noting that just because a vehicle has an official passenger capacity of say 8, it doesn't mean that's all it can carry.

          I've personally been sardined in the back of a buttoned Australian M113 with 14 men (plus 2 crew) including packs. Note that with the addition of the commanders turret, the rated capacity is only 9 passengers. It wasn't all that comfortable, but still better than walking.
          To give you an idea of how tight it was, consider that approximately 2 packs take up about the same space as a person. Now consider cramming 20 people into a small car....
          If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

          Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

          Mors ante pudorem

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
            Now consider cramming 20 people into a small car....
            Clowns do it all the time...
            I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

            Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

            Comment


            • #36
              Hmmm, we did have paint on our faces, no red noses though.
              If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

              Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

              Mors ante pudorem

              Comment


              • #37
                I chose the LAV-25 simply because between a forrunner of the M113 and the LAV-25 I got to examine up close in '97 at Camp Pendleton* the LAV-25 just seemed better at the sort of fast paced gun and run sorts of action members of my family seem to enjoy.


                *I was visiting rather than stationed although it was much more interesting at the time to visit the Force Recon encampment and find out that tucked back in their armory they had supressed handguns that dated back to my grandfather's WWII service.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
                  Clowns do it all the time...
                  Always wondered were clowns learned to stuff a car...
                  The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Huh, well that might be the reason why I always heard Benning referred to as Clown School...

                    Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

                    Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I chose the LAV-25 mostly based on the mobility and repair ability mentioned above by several posters and partly because I just love the look of the thing.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I picked the BMP-2. I dont know, I just like it. I know theres better out there. I just dig it.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          depends on the situation im going into. escape from kaliz i'd have to go with a BMP due to ease of mobility(and ease of getting spare parts).
                          if its a heavy fight the M7 Bfist wins the day.


                          if i'm going into the kind of fight im good at, well i gotta go with the LAV-25/stryker since its one of few overglorified battle taxi's that can even get to the arena.
                          the best course of action when all is against you is to slow down and think critically about the situation. this way you are not blindly rushing into an ambush and your mind is doing something useful rather than getting you killed.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            I went for the M2 then regretted it- I kinda doubt the utility of firing ports in a situation where the main armament is necessary, and if it's not then why risk exposing the vehicle to man-portable missiles Based on that I'd have gone for either the Warrior, or one of the wheeled vehicles just for the economy/repairability issues.
                            Of course, if use of standard parts/wheels/tyres is the priority, how about the Humber Pig
                            I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              KillDozer

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by ArmySGT. View Post

                                Now there's something you don't see every day...

                                Too bad they didn't have any antitank weapons.
                                "The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
                                — David Drake

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X