I like it. very good work! only one thing I've seen is the Mirage IV is not only supersonic strategic bombers in the world, the US B-1 and FB-111's are both supersonic, other then that I loved it. keep up the good work !
"There is only one tactical principal which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wounds, death and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time."
--General George S. Patton, Jr.
I don't think the B-1 was in service before the mid-1980s but for the early-1980s timeline it could easily be replaced with the USN's A-5 Vigilante.
From memory I think the US has at least one or two aircraft capable of the supersonic strategic bomber role since the 1960s (such as the B-58 Hustler) and the Soviets had the Tu-22 from about the same time
It's entirely possible the USAF might have some B-58 aircraft in storage that they could reactivate for the 1983 timeline (I think they went out of service in 1970)
"There is only one tactical principal which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wounds, death and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time."
--General George S. Patton, Jr.
I like it. very good work! only one thing I've seen is the Mirage IV is not only supersonic strategic bombers in the world, the US B-1 and FB-111's are both supersonic, other then that I loved it. keep up the good work !
Right for the FB-111. I agree also for the B-1 but I don't consider it to be in the same class. In fact, I made two mistakes: forgot the FB-111 and I should have said mach 2-class (I don't know if that's how you say it in english).
Shame and appologies. By the way, when I wrote that the Strategic command was taken its pant's off, I didn't count the FB-111 and nuclear bombs deployed abroad. I let that to our US members (they'll know more than I do).
I don't think the B-1 was in service before the mid-1980s but for the early-1980s timeline it could easily be replaced with the USN's A-5 Vigilante.
From memory I think the US has at least one or two aircraft capable of the supersonic strategic bomber role since the 1960s (such as the B-58 Hustler) and the Soviets had the Tu-22 from about the same time
It's entirely possible the USAF might have some B-58 aircraft in storage that they could reactivate for the 1983 timeline (I think they went out of service in 1970)
Forgot about these (memory malfunction, I'll be 40 this year, this must explain that). Nice addition. I didn't count the Tu-22 on purpose, as it was the oponent.
B-58s and A-5s won't be refurbished in time for this event, unless you believe that the Carter and Reagan Administrations were working together to plan this nuclear war.
My Twilight claim to fame: I ran "Allegheny Uprising" at Allegheny College, spring of 1988.
B-58s and A-5s won't be refurbished in time for this event, unless you believe that the Carter and Reagan Administrations were working together to plan this nuclear war.
Ditto that for the B-1A original version.
I can't imagine the Carter and Reagan administrations working together on anything, and you'd also have to assume that Carter knew Reagan would be elected president in 1980 -- until halfway through the primaries, that was far from certain.
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes
At the time: Canada, Turkey, Italy, Germany (funny isn't it), Greece... Canada went out of it in 1984 (now I know why I like Canadian so much), Greece was out only by 2001.
B-58s and A-5s won't be refurbished in time for this event, unless you believe that the Carter and Reagan Administrations were working together to plan this nuclear war.
I was only thinking of the A-5 (phased out in 1980). And no I don't think that.
Comment