Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

British Infantry Rifles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by James Langham View Post
    Depends on the environment, Europe will be more foot work and close observation as opposed to direct action (at least while airstrikes are available).
    Pretty much.

    There is an endearing myth about the SAS that goes back to their WW2 days as raiders. The modern incarnation of the SAS are mostly recon and observation units. The Gulf war was a good example, the SAS was tasked with finding Iraqi scuds and calling down airstrikes, they where not tasked with going after them directly.

    Compare that to the Russian Spetsnaz whose task is to go behind enemy lines and sabotage rear areas and eliminate HVTs.

    Another role the SAS has found themselves in the past is as advisors and trainers, in asimilar fashion to the US green berets. In the twilight war I can envision SAS teams assistin anti-communist units behind soviet lines.

    That's not to say the SAS can't or won't go after HVTs, especialy after the NATO air forces start to wind down operations due to losses and lack of parts. But it's not their primary role anymore.
    Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
      Pretty much.

      There is an endearing myth about the SAS that goes back to their WW2 days as raiders. The modern incarnation of the SAS are mostly recon and observation units. The Gulf war was a good example, the SAS was tasked with finding Iraqi scuds and calling down airstrikes, they where not tasked with going after them directly.

      Compare that to the Russian Spetsnaz whose task is to go behind enemy lines and sabotage rear areas and eliminate HVTs.

      Another role the SAS has found themselves in the past is as advisors and trainers, in asimilar fashion to the US green berets. In the twilight war I can envision SAS teams assistin anti-communist units behind soviet lines.

      That's not to say the SAS can't or won't go after HVTs, especialy after the NATO air forces start to wind down operations due to losses and lack of parts. But it's not their primary role anymore.
      Another role for 23SAS was rescue to shot down pilots.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by James Langham View Post
        Another role for 23SAS was rescue to shot down pilots.
        Good point
        Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by James Langham View Post
          Another role for 23SAS was rescue to shot down pilots.
          If I recall correctly, the Cold War Territorial SAS units were tasked with a bunch of stay behind/infiltration missions in the Warsaw Pact rear -- calling air strikes and artillery on high value targets in the deep battle area, recovery of aviators and other isolated personnel (taking over the role of, if I recall correctly, MI 9 in WW2), and some tertiary derring do with raiding/sabotage of rail lines, bridges, etc. Not having to cover down on contingency missions and having a fairly specialized remit was (I'm guessing) hoped to overcome the difficulty of keeping reserve special operations effective.

          Similar with at least some of the US reserve SF units. At least one battalion, maybe the whole group in 11th or 12th SFG (US Army Reserve) spent several decades training to do the same sort of role in Norway if the balloon went up. The other USAR group and two NG groups switched around some on area orientation and such but guys from the former USAR side of SF I've talked to made it sound like there was always a reserve SF unit slated to support NATO's northern flank.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by HorseSoldier View Post
            Similar with at least some of the US reserve SF units. At least one battalion, maybe the whole group in 11th or 12th SFG (US Army Reserve) spent several decades training to do the same sort of role in Norway if the balloon went up. The other USAR group and two NG groups switched around some on area orientation and such but guys from the former USAR side of SF I've talked to made it sound like there was always a reserve SF unit slated to support NATO's northern flank.
            That was 1/10th SFG. In addition, part of the SFDB's job was to exfiltrate West Berlin and do sabotage and hit-and-run raids in East Germany and East Berlin.
            I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

            Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by HorseSoldier View Post
              If I recall correctly, the Cold War Territorial SAS units were tasked with a bunch of stay behind/infiltration missions in the Warsaw Pact rear -- calling air strikes and artillery on high value targets in the deep battle area, recovery of aviators and other isolated personnel (taking over the role of, if I recall correctly, MI 9 in WW2), and some tertiary derring do with raiding/sabotage of rail lines, bridges, etc. Not having to cover down on contingency missions and having a fairly specialized remit was (I'm guessing) hoped to overcome the difficulty of keeping reserve special operations effective.

              Similar with at least some of the US reserve SF units. At least one battalion, maybe the whole group in 11th or 12th SFG (US Army Reserve) spent several decades training to do the same sort of role in Norway if the balloon went up. The other USAR group and two NG groups switched around some on area orientation and such but guys from the former USAR side of SF I've talked to made it sound like there was always a reserve SF unit slated to support NATO's northern flank.
              Of course all of this goes out of the window in Twilight 2000 with the way the war starts...

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
                Pretty much.

                There is an endearing myth about the SAS that goes back to their WW2 days as raiders. The modern incarnation of the SAS are mostly recon and observation units. The Gulf war was a good example, the SAS was tasked with finding Iraqi scuds and calling down airstrikes, they where not tasked with going after them directly.

                Compare that to the Russian Spetsnaz whose task is to go behind enemy lines and sabotage rear areas and eliminate HVTs.

                Another role the SAS has found themselves in the past is as advisors and trainers, in asimilar fashion to the US green berets. In the twilight war I can envision SAS teams assistin anti-communist units behind soviet lines.

                That's not to say the SAS can't or won't go after HVTs, especialy after the NATO air forces start to wind down operations due to losses and lack of parts. But it's not their primary role anymore.
                I'm going by reports comming out of the first Gulf war. Yes they did mostly call in Airstrikes...But they also did some direct action missions. A Squadron of the 22nd SAS did perform a direct action at a high value target at Victor 2. the target was supost to be protected by a platoon of about 30 men. Durring the strike they found themselveds in a firefight with ten times that number. Other scudhunting groups prepared to go with direct actions in the case of Human shields. I'm not saying that it's their primary mission, most of my kin's actions in the past 50 years was gathering intelligence and leading a Firqua. That's one of the gratest strenghts of the SAS they adapt to the tactical and stratigic needs of Great Britan.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Rockwolf66 View Post
                  That's one of the gratest strenghts of the SAS they adapt to the tactical and stratigic needs of Great Britan.
                  The SAS troopers at their main base not far from me, at Campbell Barracks in Swanbourne, don't usually seem to have much interest in "adapting to the tactical and strategic needs of Great Britain" .
                  sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Targan View Post
                    The SAS troopers at their main base not far from me, at Campbell Barracks in Swanbourne, don't usually seem to have much interest in "adapting to the tactical and strategic needs of Great Britain" .
                    Dunno, if we need a bit of support out there I'm sure our colonial kin will be willing to lend a hand.
                    Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
                      Dunno, if we need a bit of support out there I'm sure our colonial kin will be willing to lend a hand.
                      Even without officially playing some of them turn up in Poland helping against the Russians!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by James Langham View Post
                        Even without officially playing some of them turn up in Poland helping against the Russians!
                        Or are they really helping the Russians against NATO They wouldn't be the first of the west's allies to switch sides...
                        If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

                        Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

                        Mors ante pudorem

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          A couple other firearms to consider could also be the British made version of the G3A3 and G3A4 which I have personally seen when I was in england all had enfield markings! Great write up.

                          Brother in Arms

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Brother in Arms View Post
                            A couple other firearms to consider could also be the British made version of the G3A3 and G3A4 which I have personally seen when I was in england all had enfield markings! Great write up.

                            Brother in Arms
                            When did you see them HK was British owned in the 1990s.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Rockwolf66 View Post
                              Good Article about the regular British Army. I know that the SAS and whatever the 14th Intelligence company is now designated uses some different weapons.

                              For the 14th they use the

                              Walther PPK
                              Browning High Power(probably replaced by the SIG P226)
                              MP5K
                              HK53 short assault rifle
                              G3KA4 short assault rifle

                              The SAS uses similar weapons, but given that they are tasked with Direct action some things are added lile the M16 with M203.

                              Then Again this is TW2K and some things didn't happen and other things got put into production.
                              Is it the PP or the PPK

                              Also the Welrod silent bolt action pistol.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I saw them around 2007 or 2008 they were in a massive arms dump in England. There where about 25 of them or so and they all had green furniture much to my suprise when I inspected them they had enfield markings.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X