With regard to supply chains in relation to Military and Law Enforcement, it's like comparing apples and oranges.
The military have a very high turnover of ammunition and therefore their weapons wear out faster and require more maintenance including replacement parts.
How many law enforcement personnel fire their weapon more than a few rounds a year to qualify? Just take a look at the recent posts in Stupid Things thread to see what I'm getting at...
So, law enforcement really doesn't need much in the way of logistical support and therefore can afford to pick up whatever they feel like. They don't need to even glance at military procurement unless they really, really want a weapon which will be suitable for the battlefield rather than wounding a suspect.
Apples and oranges....
The military have a very high turnover of ammunition and therefore their weapons wear out faster and require more maintenance including replacement parts.
How many law enforcement personnel fire their weapon more than a few rounds a year to qualify? Just take a look at the recent posts in Stupid Things thread to see what I'm getting at...
So, law enforcement really doesn't need much in the way of logistical support and therefore can afford to pick up whatever they feel like. They don't need to even glance at military procurement unless they really, really want a weapon which will be suitable for the battlefield rather than wounding a suspect.
Apples and oranges....
Comment