I see that the 93 Games forum for T2013 is down. What does everyone think of inviting the crowd over here After all, it is 3rd edition, and anyone that interested in keeping our game going should have a place at the table.
My two cents worth Invite them all here. Worse thing that really happens IMHO is that we just disagree on certain points. Thing is, we need constant exchange of ideas to keep this board alive IMO, we can't afford to be too picky. But again, that's just my loose change.
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
— David Drake
Opinions are always welcome, no matter what they are.
But you do have a point Fus. 3rd edition is drastically different, and i think its going to take a while to grasp some of the background...or get around to changing it like we do with the first three versions.
Right now Im working through learning the reflex system well enough to modify it for faster play, and using T2k's background.
It struck me on the way home that many games definitely have a certain kind of following. D&D seems to be where most people start out, but the Cold Warriors, Vets and Military Buffs seem to gravitate towards Twilight. One of the things that impressed me was it seemed that 2013 had an angle of encouraging people who dont know much about the military to come and play. At first the lesser emphasis on the armed forces kind of made me wince...but the more I thought about it the better the idea seems to me. Its helping to keep the game alive.
One of the things that impressed me was it seemed that 2013 had an angle of encouraging people who dont know much about the military to come and play. At first the lesser emphasis on the armed forces kind of made me wince...but the more I thought about it the better the idea seems to me. Its helping to keep the game alive.
That was, in fact, the design intent.
- C.
Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996
It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
- Josh Olson
I have made a number of open and specific invitations to members of the T2013 forum to join us here and those invitations still stand. I guess if the T2013 forum is no longer functioning it will be a bit hard to re-post an invitation there. I enthusiastically welcome any T2013 forum members who choose to join this forum. We have successfully integrated T2013 discussions in this forum for a long time now. I'm all for inclusiveness
sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
And certainly no need that I can see to split off into a seperate section such as has been done with Morrow Project. Doesn't take much to specify in a post that your comment/question relates to 2013 or an alternate timeline instead of 2000.
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.
Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"
All one would need to do to specify which version one would like to address/discuss is put it in the thread title.
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:
Snake Eyes is correct. Most of us lurk 99.9% of the time.
Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Snake Eyes is correct. Most of us lurk 99.9% of the time.
Outstanding. Glad you're all here!
Right now Im working on some material that uses the reflex system with the 2.0 background.
At first I was at a bit of a loss of what to do with the 3.0 background. The losses in population are far greater, the problems greater, and lots of things that have to be done with very little time, resources or people to do it with. It reminds me of something His Grace Commander Sam Vimes said;
"Dont think of it a one big bucket of snakes, take things one at a time. What needs to be done first...............Everything. Okay...start again..."
So one of the ideas I had for a campaign was to first have the Players build (or given) some VERY high level characters. As in stars on their shoulders, and Command Staff of NORTHCOM. Then give them bits and pieces of the background and let the Players figure out what needs to be done first. Then some of the major decisions could be played out from several different angles.
Comment