We had a CAV Squadron on the range we needed that we had to have Division kick off of the range so we could take it. They were getting ready to shoot their M3s (unfortunately their concept for M3s didn't work for tanks or our M2s).
What was the issue with the M3 material not transferring to the M2 Aren't they the same vehicle in terms of weapon capabilities
- C.
Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996
It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
- Josh Olson
What was the issue with the M3 material not transferring to the M2 Aren't they the same vehicle in terms of weapon capabilities
- C.
No issues with the ammo. The range concept is what we couldn't use. Their planned scenario is different for a Cav Scout than an Infantryman. And we're shooting M1A2 SEPs this week, not the Brads.
Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Actually, we need an SF S3 shop. We've got the SOF augmentation mission. It's going to be an interesting experience.
One of our base documents for coming up with our training plan is this. A fairly good read. But absolutely nothing to do with mechanized warfare.
Looks like good material. However you know that Big Army is going to reject it out of hand. There is SF and then there is Big Army. When you send it up atleast the MP material is in a format they know, and is described in terms they will understand. The SF style is fluid, dynamic, and driven by events on the ground. A complete anathema to any Brigade S shop product.
Spare yourself the pain of six thousand revisions.
Comment