Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prepared for Frankenstorm?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
    Even just trying to model the blast and damage patterns of the initial strike could get "interesting" when you throw in such a powerful storm. Makes me wonder what a nuke going off at the eye would do to it...
    Probably not much of a result.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_...nitude_(energy)

    IF I read this article correctly, (I am not a expert in energy production )

    One day of rain from an average hurricane is 1000x more energy released than a 50MT Tsar Bomba blast.

    So, if I read this right, hurricane Sandy (NOT an average hurricane ) would not even be affected by a nuke. It would probably take a good chunk of our nuclear arsenal to have an effect on a hurricane.

    My $0.02

    Mike

    Comment


    • #17
      Having witnessed the effects of Sandy firsthand, I would say that I very much doubt a nuke or two would have had much effect, though granted a storm this size was rather unprecedented, hence the media-coined term "Frankenstorm". It annoys me how the media use to love labels like this to sell their "if it bleeds, it's a read" articles, but that's a discussion for another time.

      When Sandy hit, I was one of the few crazy enough to venture outside (Disclaimer: DO NOT try this at home when a hurricane or tornado hits) to check one or two things...the wind was literally HOWLING so damn loud I could barely hear myself think.
      "The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
      — David Drake

      Comment

      Working...
      X