Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Regular US Army in 1968

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Regular US Army in 1968

    The Regular U.S. Army in April 1968

    1st Armored Division Fort Hood, Texas
    2nd Armored Division Fort Hood, Texas
    3rd Armored Division Frankfurt, West Germany
    4th Armored Division Goppingen, West Germany
    1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) Camp Evans, South Vietnam
    1st Infantry Division Lai Khe, South Vietnam
    2nd Infantry Division Tonggu Ri, South Korea
    3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) Wurzburg, West Germany
    4th Infantry Division Pleiku, South Vietnam
    5th Infantry Division (Mechanized)
    Fort Carson, Colorado (one brigade in South Vietnam)
    6th Infantry Division
    Fort Campbell, Kentucky (one brigade in Hawaii)
    7th Infantry Division Dopsu-dong, South Korea
    8th Infantry Division Bad-Kreuznach, West Germany
    9th Infantry Division Bear Cat, South Veitnam
    23rd Infantry Division Chu Lai, South Vietnam
    24th Infantry Division
    Fort Riley, Kansas, (one brigade in West Germany)
    25th Infantry Division Cu Chi, South Vietnam
    82nd Airborne Division
    Fort Bragg, North Carolina, (one brigade in South Vietnam)
    101st Airborne Division Hue-Phu Bai, South Vietnam
    2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment Nurnberg, West Germany
    3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment Baumholder, West Germany
    6th Armored Cavalry Regiment Fort Meade, Maryland
    11th Armored Cavalry Regiment Xuan Loc, South Vietnam
    14th Armored Cavalry Regiment Fulda, West Germany
    171st Infantry Brigade Fort Wainwright, Alaska
    172nd Infantry Brigade Fort Richardson, Alaska
    173rd Airborne Brigade Bong Son, South Vietnam
    193rd Infantry Brigade Panama Canal Zone
    194th Armored Brigade Fort Knox, Kentucky
    197th Infantry Brigade Fort Benning, Georgia
    199th Infantry Brigade Long Binh, South Vietnam
    Berlin Brigade Berlin, West Germany

    This Order of Battle is of interest as it shows just how stretched the U.S. Army was at the height of the Vietnam War.

    Of its four armored divisions, two were stationed in West Germany with two more under REFORGER.

    Of its thirteen infantry divisions, seven were in South Vietnam, two in South Korea, two in West Germany and two in CONUS (one slatted for REFORGER and one as reinforcement for South Vietnam).

    Of the two airborne divisions, one was in South Vietnam and one in CONUS (with one brigade in South Vietnam).

    Of the five armored cavalry regiments, one was in South Vietnam, three in West Germany and one in CONUS/REFORGER.

    One armored brigade was in CONUS, slatted for REFORGER.

    One airborne brigade was in South Vietnam

    Of the six infantry brigades, one was in West Germany; one in the Panama Canal Zone, two in South Vietnam and two in CONUS.

    I have not included the National Guard and Army Reserve units as during this period of time, both were low on manpower and equipment and were not considered to be combat ready without at least 90 days of workup.

    sources are the Army Green Book, 1968 and Vietnam Order of Battle by Shelby Stanton
    Last edited by dragoon500ly; 02-06-2013, 11:16 AM.
    The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

  • #2
    Very interesting part of American military history. One very minor nit that needs to be picked. Fort Bragg is in North Carolina, not Georgia.

    My $0.02

    Mike

    Comment


    • #3
      The Armor Battalion in Vietnam

      The MTOE 17-35E for the Armor Battalion (as modified for Vietnam) comprised

      Headquarters and Headquarters Company with 16 officers, 1 warrant officer and 139 enlisted men. There would be a section of 3 M-48 MBTs, 4 M-106A1 4.2-inch mortar carriers, 9 M-113 APCs as well as 5 2.5-ton trucks and 12 jeeps
      Companies A, B & C would each consist of 5 officers and 87 enlisted men. With 17 M-48 MBTs, 1 M-113 APC, 1 M-88 ARV, 1 2.5-ton truck, 1 3/4-ton truck and 3 jeeps.
      Company D (Service) had 6 officers, 2 warrant officers, and 152 enlisted men. With 2 M-113 APCs, 2 M-48 AVLBs, 2 M-88 ARVs, 2 5-ton wreckers, 20 5-ton trucks, 10 2.5-ton trucks, 5 3/4-ton trucks and 12 jeeps.

      source is Stanton's Vietnam Order of Battle
      The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

      Comment


      • #4
        I remember, as a young teenager (13 14) finding my father's Army Officer's Guide (hardback book, ca 1963). One of its chapters was a listing of posts, stateside and overseas, which had some divisional assignments. I took notes of that part, of course, since I'd only dealt with OBs in WW2 before that. In that pre-Internet era, that was big.

        Obviously, nothing dealt with Vietnam at that date, and there was a lot on post etiquette and things. A peek into a different world.

        Re: Vietnam-- Stanton's "Death of an American Army" was a very good read, too.
        My Twilight claim to fame: I ran "Allegheny Uprising" at Allegheny College, spring of 1988.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mikeo80 View Post
          Very interesting part of American military history. One very minor nit that needs to be picked. Fort Bragg is in North Carolina, not Georgia.

          My $0.02

          Mike
          What can I say....I only had three cups of semi-coffee....this de-caff is for the birds!
          The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

          Comment


          • #6
            Considering how much of the available manpower, equipment and aircraft were deployed to SE Asia, it would have been a great time for the Russians to "liberate" Western Europe.
            The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

            Comment


            • #7
              This is a very interesting post. You're right, it DOES show that there was a heavy deployment in Vietnam and appears to be light in there rest of the world. However the deployment of forces is not as signifgant as it appears.

              First as a backdrop, the US army standard was, following world war 2, a supposed two war standard, having the capability to fight 2 full wars at the same time, such as Japan and Germany. Its important to note that in 1960s, this standard didn't mean that they could fight both wars immediately at the same time, but within a reasonble short amount of time. This was later changed to a one and a half war standard in the 90s, meaning a full war in europe and something smaller elsewhere.

              In "ringed in steel" the executive officer (and careerist) in the US Army's 11th ACR complained that spare parts and new vehicles were going to Europe, left overs where going to Vietnam. I know that I've seen other sources as well, but can't quite remember well. Also, something to keep in mind is that the leftover WW2 stocks of equipment were still in hand, especially ships. The mothball fleets of the 60s were a lot bigger then they are today. This is important because when talking about REFORGER, the hardest thing to do is manage the logistics of moving the army from CONUS to europe.

              It is an interesting paradox, because even though the bulk of the new hardware was going to Europe, the bulk of the draftees were going to Vietnam. Also, the bulk of the career NCO corps was there as well. However, its important to note that although there were quite a few 2 and 3 term veterans, they weren't left there until they were KIA. They rotated them out and back to other duty stations, along with the officers too. Its also important to remember that this wasn't today's volunteer army. It was a draftee army with a very large NCO corps as a base. The divisions other then those deployed to Vietnam could be brought up to 100% strength in a matter of months. In the war on terror, all of the old WW2 training centers that have been shut down for years, like Atterbury and Shelby, were re-opened for buisiness. The army reserve drill sergeant units would be receiving and training them as replacements rather quickly.

              As far as the comments about the national guard, thats a very large hole in this assumption that should be addressed. Until even recently, there are many Vietnam veterans that were still in service. I've had the oppertunity to speak to them for uncounted hours and uniformly they told me that the national guard was always at 125% strength. This is because service in the guard meant no deployment to Vietnam. They even told me that when soldiers didn't come to drill, they were transferred to active duty or discharge, thus available for deployment and someone new was brought in.

              Also, I remember that in 1993 there was a huge downsizing of the guard. There were a massive number of National Guard Divisions available, even with older equipment. Another important thing to remember is that in the same 1993-1994 downsizing, the Army Reserve lost its combat elements. Back down, those too were quite extensive. Just a small example of what was in New England when I was a private:

              New Hampshire: A reserve infantry brigade from the 94th ARCOM, I believe it was the 187th.

              Vermont: The 86th Armored Brigade

              New York: The 27th Infantry Brigade, the 42nd Infantry Divsion (with 3 full NY NG brigades)

              Massachussets: The 26th Infantry Division (2 brigades) The 94th ARCOM (1 tank brigade)

              Conneticut: 43rd Infantry Brigade

              New Jersey: 50th Armored Division (2 brigades)

              Pennslvania: 28th Infantry Division (3 brigades)

              14 combat brigades = 70,000 combat troops in just new england

              Under the cold war ARFGEN cycle, it took 6 months to get a NG Brigade sized or bigger unit mobilized and overseas. In the greater scheme of a full scale war, thats not long.

              Overall, I think that its interesting to see what kind of drain the war put on the army, but at the same time, I don't think that it wouldn't be able to fight and win if another battle occured elsewhere at the same time. Thanks for posting. I didn't realize that a couple of those independant brigades and the 14th ACR existed into the 60s.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
                What can I say....I only had three cups of semi-coffee....this de-caff is for the birds!
                What An American drinking de caff That stuff is for sissies.

                I sentence you to a pot of day old, cold coffee as punishment for your crime.



                My $0.02

                Mike

                Comment


                • #9
                  The impact of the Vietnam War on Europe is always misunderstood. Many of the divisions in West Germany were significantly undermanned and had critical shortages in NCOs and officers. According to the Congressional Records, on average, these units ran as much as 25-30% understrength in the key leadership positions.

                  Critical communications equipment and spares were stripped to support the Vietnam War, when the AN/PRC-77 radio entered service, it was deployed to SE Asia, US Army Europe maintained PRC-25s for almost three years after their replacement.

                  Artillery ammunition was removed in such large amounts that there were critical shortages in heavy artillery ammunition. Shortly after the Tet Offensive, stocks of 155mm+ was reduced to less than seven days stocks as part of a rush to restock the heavy usage in Vietnam.

                  While the National Guard/Army Reserve did enjoy an increase in personnel, many of whom did enlist in order to not see service in Vietnam, their equipment levels, in 1968, was poor. Many NG units were still equipped with WWII/Korean War-era M-1 Garands and M-191A4 machine guns, and this was as late as 1972! The Guard was still operating M-46/47 tanks and was just starting to be equipped with M-48s as the new M-60 tanks were coming into service.

                  Would the US have been able to maintain a major conflict in SE Asia and stop a Soviet attack into Europe It's an intresting what if.
                  The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by mikeo80 View Post
                    What An American drinking de caff That stuff is for sissies.

                    I sentence you to a pot of day old, cold coffee as punishment for your crime.



                    My $0.02

                    Mike
                    And I yearn for the good old days when the coffee was strong if the spoon stood upright...but alas! The march of time is catching up with the old man. Next up is puffed oatmeal flavored air for breakfast, that funny orange-tasting stuff to keep one regular and the sheer joy (NOT) of that ole prostate exam.

                    This 'ell getting old!!!!

                    All well, I content myself in the knowledge that I may not be the fastest, anymore, but I have the wisdom and treachery to keep the young'ins in line!!!!

                    The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
                      And I yearn for the good old days when the coffee was strong if the spoon stood upright...but alas! The march of time is catching up with the old man. Next up is puffed oatmeal flavored air for breakfast, that funny orange-tasting stuff to keep one regular and the sheer joy (NOT) of that ole prostate exam.

                      This 'ell getting old!!!!

                      All well, I content myself in the knowledge that I may not be the fastest, anymore, but I have the wisdom and treachery to keep the young'ins in line!!!!

                      No offense, Dragoon, but I think I am older than you. ( Born 1953)

                      So yes, wisdom and treachery are great tools....just don't piss off the young guy who will out draw you...

                      So, shoot first....

                      My $0.02

                      Mike

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The Infantry Battalion in Vietnam

                        The modified TO&E for an Infantry Battalion in SE Asia is of intrest:

                        Headquarters and Headquarters Company with 15 officers, 2 warrant officers and 147 enlisted men. With 9 2.5-ton truck; 4 3/4-ton trucks; 9 jeeps. Small arms included 2 M-60 GPMGs, 8 M-79 GLs, 15 pistols and 149 M-16s.

                        Company A, B, C & D, each with 6 officers and 158 enlisted men. With 5 jeeps. Small arms included 6 M-60 GPMGs, 24 M-79 GLs, 9 pistols, 149 M-16s, 3 81mm mortars and 3 90mm recoilless rifles.

                        Company E (Combat Support Company) with 4 officers and 96 enlisted men. With 4 3/4-ton trucks, 4 jeeps. Small arms included 6 M-79 GLs, 4 pistols, 96 M-16s, 4 4.2-inch mortars and 12 flamethrowers.

                        The Rifle Company headquarters consisted of two officers and two enlisted men, with three rifle platoons (one officer and 41 enlisted men) and one mortar platoon (one officer and 25 enlisted men).

                        Each rifle platoon had a platoon headquarters (one officer and 2 enlisted men), three rifle squads (10 men each) and one weapons squad (9 men). The weapons squad would leave their recoilless rifles back in the base camp and function was a fourth maneuver squad.

                        The mortar platoon had a headquarters (one officer and 7 men) and three mortar squads (6 men). The 81mm mortars were often left back in the base camp and the platoon used was a fourth maneuver platoon.
                        The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
                          The impact of the Vietnam War on Europe is always misunderstood. Many of the divisions in West Germany were significantly undermanned and had critical shortages in NCOs and officers. According to the Congressional Records, on average, these units ran as much as 25-30% understrength in the key leadership positions.
                          A fascinating book that touched on this was Michael Lee Lanning's "The battles of peace." He'd commanded a rifle platoon and company in Vietnam (as a lieutenant), then once a captain, a mech company in 1970s Germany. His descriptions of the contrasts were interesting.

                          Artillery ammunition was removed in such large amounts that there were critical shortages in heavy artillery ammunition. Shortly after the Tet Offensive, stocks of 155mm+ was reduced to less than seven days stocks as part of a rush to restock the heavy usage in Vietnam.
                          I've also read that the AF and Navy dropped so many bombs that planes were sent north with 1/2 loads (or less!), and that we had to buy back bombs we'd sold to West Germany.

                          Many NG units were still equipped with WWII/Korean War-era M-1 Garands and M-1919A4 machine guns, and this was as late as 1972!
                          Famously, you can see that in the many pictures of the Ohio NG at Kent State were carrying M-1s.

                          Would the US have been able to maintain a major conflict in SE Asia and stop a Soviet attack into Europe It's an interesting what if.
                          Well, the Soviets were as screwed up as we now know they were, so it would have been a mess. 1968 would have been particularly bad, as the North Koreans were definitely heating things up that year, too. Some have called 1968-69 the Second Korean War. The Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia that year, France was having student riots. NATO would have had its hands full, and the US would be a maximum stretch. Sounds like a recipe for nuclear escalation.

                          And, if you believe some authors, someone in the KGB sent the K-129 to launch a nuke at Hawaii, pretending to be the lone Chinese SSBN. That would have gone off 5 days before my birthday-- that was chilling to realize, let me tell you.
                          My Twilight claim to fame: I ran "Allegheny Uprising" at Allegheny College, spring of 1988.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by mikeo80 View Post
                            No offense, Dragoon, but I think I am older than you. ( Born 1953)

                            So yes, wisdom and treachery are great tools....just don't piss off the young guy who will out draw you...

                            So, shoot first....

                            My $0.02

                            Mike
                            1959 here! And I never worry about the young'ins beating me to the draw; a knife in the back is so much more reliable!!!

                            The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Perhaps the major impact on the Army in Vietnam was the one year (13 months for the Marines!). As soon as that 11-B begins to become an effective jungle-fighter, BAM! He's back in the states. There are numerous stories of as much as HALF (and there are accounts of at least 2 companies losing 2/3 of their men!!) of a rifle company rotating home at the same time.

                              So while the NVA/VC stayed in the field for years, the GIs were often kids straight out of Basic.

                              And to add insult to injury, MACV/DOD adopted the policy of assigning a officer to 6 months in a combat position and then 6 months in a staff position. The official reason was to allow as many officers as possible to get combat experience...

                              There are numerous words that can discribe the impact of these two policies...most of them are four letter and insult the intelligence of the high ranking officers and civilian leadership!
                              The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X