Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Regular US Army in 1968

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    But it wasn't just a U.S. War....

    Ive listed the US order of battle for the Vietnam Warbut this was not just a US war.

    Australia

    Starting in 1965, Australia dispatched advisors and a battalion task force to Vietnam. In 1966, this was raised to a short brigade of two infantry battalions, a cavalry squadron, 2/3 of a artillery battery, as well as support, naval and air assets. The 1st Australian Task Force was stationed at Nui Dai (some 35 miles southeast of Saigon), they remained in South Vietnam until 1971.

    New Zealand

    From July 1965 until June 1972, New Zealand provided two rifle companies and a artillery battery that served with the 1st Australian Task Force.

    Philippines

    From September 1966 until December 1969, the Philippines provided a Civic Action Group that operated in Tay Ninh Province. At its height, this consisted of a infantry battalion, a artillery battalion, a engineer battalion and support services.

    Thailand

    Thailands commitment involved three different units: The Royal Thai Army Volunteer Force, consisting of a reinforced regiment based on the oeQueens Cobras served at Bear Cat from September 1967 to August 1968. They operated with the U.S. 9th Infantry Division.

    The Royal Thai Army Expeditionary Division (Black Panthers) served at Bear Cat from February 1969 until August 1971. During this period, three infantry brigades rotated through Bear Cat.

    The Royal Thai Army Volunteer Force came back into service in September 1971 and served until March 1972. It consisted of a infantry brigade, three artillery battalions and service troops.

    Republic of Korea

    The Republic of Korea Forces Vietnam Field Command served from August 1966 until March 1973. It was based at Nha Trang. At first, it was comprised of two battalions but was rapidly expanded to a corps-sized formation. It consisted of the Capital Division, the 9th Infantry Division and the 2nd Marine Corps Brigade.

    Republic of Vietnam

    The order of battle for South Vietnam varied widely, but as the U.S withdrawal in December of 1972, it consisted of:

    Eleven infantry divisions, a Parachutist Division, and a Marine Division.

    All told, 18 armored cavalry squadrons, 124 infantry battalions, 9 marine battalions, 55 ranger battalions, 44 artillery battalions (105mm), 15 artillery battalions (155mm), 5 artillery battalions (175mm), 4 air defense battalions (40mm/Quad .50), 40 engineer battalions, 16 signal battalions and 12 military police battalions. In addition to this, there were also 176 howitzer platoons (2 105mm) stationed across the country.

    This force was comprised of 108,675 Regulars; 376,946 Regional/Popular Forces and 14,365 Border Rangers.

    North Vietnamese/Viet Cong

    As of December 1972, the NVA/VC were operating some 2 VC divisions, 12 NVA divisions in South Vietnam, a grand total of 309 battalions (infantry, sapper, security and reconnaissance).

    This force was comprised of 89,834 NVA regular, 20,000 NVA oeadvisors in VC units and some 30,332 VC.
    The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
      The impact of the Vietnam War on Europe is always misunderstood. Many of the divisions in West Germany were significantly undermanned and had critical shortages in NCOs and officers. According to the Congressional Records, on average, these units ran as much as 25-30% understrength in the key leadership positions.

      Critical communications equipment and spares were stripped to support the Vietnam War, when the AN/PRC-77 radio entered service, it was deployed to SE Asia, US Army Europe maintained PRC-25s for almost three years after their replacement.

      Artillery ammunition was removed in such large amounts that there were critical shortages in heavy artillery ammunition. Shortly after the Tet Offensive, stocks of 155mm+ was reduced to less than seven days stocks as part of a rush to restock the heavy usage in Vietnam.

      While the National Guard/Army Reserve did enjoy an increase in personnel, many of whom did enlist in order to not see service in Vietnam, their equipment levels, in 1968, was poor. Many NG units were still equipped with WWII/Korean War-era M-1 Garands and M-191A4 machine guns, and this was as late as 1972! The Guard was still operating M-46/47 tanks and was just starting to be equipped with M-48s as the new M-60 tanks were coming into service.

      Would the US have been able to maintain a major conflict in SE Asia and stop a Soviet attack into Europe It's an intresting what if.
      Its ALWAYS been like that with national guard equipment during "peacetime" even today. When the Active army had M16A2s, we had their M16A1s. When they had M1 tanks, we had M60A3s. When they started converting to the M1A1, we got their old M1s.

      BUT when it comes time for war, this changes. The government has more stuff in storage then any of us could ever imagine. When my national guard unit was deployed in 2004, suddenly all new small arms, machine guns and so on appeared. I agree with many of the comments mentioned above, but I still think you undervalue the role of the national guard in a total war, especially prior to 1993, when the guard was HUGE in manpower, and before the army reserve was decimated.

      Comment


      • #18
        Believe me, the government has stockpiles that NOONE can ever believe!!!

        But perhaps the worst part of Vietnam was that it was not a total war. LBJ, among others, made the decision not to approach Congress for a decleration of war and refused to call up the National Guard/Reserves.

        This kept the Gaurds and Reserves out of the war (expect for those personnel who did volunteer) and led to the ruthless stripping of equipment and munitions from around the world.
        The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

        Comment


        • #19
          I am reading "The Generals" by Thomas E. Ricks now and just worked my way through Vietnam and into the 1980's.

          It's really worth a read, particularly on Vietnam and the aftermath. It made me want to throw the book at the wall...I though I knew how much of a dumba$$ LBJ and Westie were....I had no idea.

          -Dave

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
            Believe me, the government has stockpiles that NOONE can ever believe!!!

            But perhaps the worst part of Vietnam was that it was not a total war. LBJ, among others, made the decision not to approach Congress for a decleration of war and refused to call up the National Guard/Reserves.

            This kept the Gaurds and Reserves out of the war (expect for those personnel who did volunteer) and led to the ruthless stripping of equipment and munitions from around the world.
            I think a Pennsylvania NG unit volunteered through out the Vietnam conflict.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by mikeo80 View Post
              No offense, Dragoon, but I think I am older than you. ( Born 1953)

              Mike
              Jesus Christ, and I thought I was old (born 1962)...you're older than my big sister (born 1959).
              I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

              Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by schnickelfritz View Post
                I am reading "The Generals" by Thomas E. Ricks now and just worked my way through Vietnam and into the 1980's.

                It's really is particularly these alternatives found over the counter for phentermine on the internet these days. Vietnam and the aftermath. It made me want to and throw the book at the wall...I though I knew much of a dumba$$ LBJ and Westie were....I had no idea.

                -Dave
                As a veteran, I would like to chime in and confirm that Vietnam was a very bad decision, failure, and disaster.
                Last edited by NelsonFoster; 07-08-2023, 04:32 AM.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
                  The Regular U.S. Army in April 1968

                  1st Armored Division Fort Hood, Texas
                  2nd Armored Division Fort Hood, Texas
                  3rd Armored Division Frankfurt, West Germany
                  4th Armored Division Goppingen, West Germany
                  1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) Camp Evans, South Vietnam
                  1st Infantry Division Lai Khe, South Vietnam
                  2nd Infantry Division Tonggu Ri, South Korea
                  3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) Wurzburg, West Germany
                  4th Infantry Division Pleiku, South Vietnam
                  5th Infantry Division (Mechanized)
                  Fort Carson, Colorado (one brigade in South Vietnam)
                  6th Infantry Division
                  Fort Campbell, Kentucky (one brigade in Hawaii)
                  7th Infantry Division Dopsu-dong, South Korea
                  8th Infantry Division Bad-Kreuznach, West Germany
                  9th Infantry Division Bear Cat, South Veitnam
                  23rd Infantry Division Chu Lai, South Vietnam
                  24th Infantry Division
                  Fort Riley, Kansas, (one brigade in West Germany)
                  25th Infantry Division Cu Chi, South Vietnam
                  82nd Airborne Division
                  Fort Bragg, North Carolina, (one brigade in South Vietnam)
                  101st Airborne Division Hue-Phu Bai, South Vietnam
                  2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment Nurnberg, West Germany
                  3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment Baumholder, West Germany
                  6th Armored Cavalry Regiment Fort Meade, Maryland
                  11th Armored Cavalry Regiment Xuan Loc, South Vietnam
                  14th Armored Cavalry Regiment Fulda, West Germany
                  171st Infantry Brigade Fort Wainwright, Alaska
                  172nd Infantry Brigade Fort Richardson, Alaska
                  173rd Airborne Brigade Bong Son, South Vietnam
                  193rd Infantry Brigade Panama Canal Zone
                  194th Armored Brigade Fort Knox, Kentucky
                  197th Infantry Brigade Fort Benning, Georgia
                  199th Infantry Brigade Long Binh, South Vietnam
                  Berlin Brigade Berlin, West Germany

                  This Order of Battle is of interest as it shows just how stretched the U.S. Army was at the height of the Vietnam War.

                  Of its four armored divisions, two were stationed in West Germany with two more under REFORGER.

                  Of its thirteen infantry divisions, seven were in South Vietnam, two in South Korea, two in West Germany and two in CONUS (one slatted for REFORGER and one as reinforcement for South Vietnam).

                  Of the two airborne divisions, one was in South Vietnam and one in CONUS (with one brigade in South Vietnam).

                  Of the five armored cavalry regiments, one was in South Vietnam, three in West Germany and one in CONUS/REFORGER.

                  One armored brigade was in CONUS, slatted for REFORGER.

                  One airborne brigade was in South Vietnam

                  Of the six infantry brigades, one was in West Germany; one in the Panama Canal Zone, two in South Vietnam and two in CONUS.

                  I have not included the National Guard and Army Reserve units as during this period of time, both were low on manpower and equipment and were not considered to be combat ready without at least 90 days of workup.

                  sources are the Army Green Book, 1968 and Vietnam Order of Battle by Shelby Stanton
                  Just a note, both the 29th (HI NG) and 69th (KS NG) IBs would be activated the next month (May) to help fill gaps. The 29th IB would go to Schofield Barracks to replace the soon to be deactivated 4th Bde 6th ID and the 69th IB would arrive as a replacement for the 1st Bde, 5th ID at Fort Carson.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by NelsonFoster View Post
                    I found otc phentermine here and it changed my life. As a veteran, I would like to chime in and confirm that Vietnam was a very bad decision, failure, and disaster.
                    I'm a veteran too and yes, Vietnam was a bad decision. Do you think Vietnam could have been avoided
                    Last edited by CharlieAnderson; 01-23-2021, 03:51 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by CharlieAnderson View Post
                      I'm a veteran too and yes, Vietnam was a bad decision. Do you think Vietnam could have been avoided
                      This is an extremely tough question to answer.

                      First a broad overview of the start of U.S. involvement in Vietnam.

                      It begins with end of World War Two and OSS operations in Vietnam that ended up supporting Ho Chi Minh with money and military supplies. With the close of the war, there was unofficial U.S. support for HCM's independence movement, NOT sanctioned by the U.S. Government. When France made the decision to deploy troops back to Indochina to resume control of its 'lost' colonies, HCM made the decision to fight.

                      France, at the time, was a critical member of NATO and was receiving extensive military and economic aid from the U.S., however, due to French laws, they were unable to deploy draftees to Vietnam, forcing them to rely upon Marine (Colonial) troops, volunteers and indigenous troops. To say that France fought the First Indochina War on an overstretched, worn out rubber band of resources overstates just how limited their resources were.

                      Imagine fighting a guerilla war with deuce and a half trucks and worn out C47s as your major transportation One were your units had to march in and out carrying everything on their backs through some of the nasty terrain in the world. Worn out, out numbered troops fighting a battle of a thousand cuts.

                      Following earlier disasters, the French came to rely on U.S. support to keep their military running. Everything from CIA mercenaries flying C119 transports, to Air Force technicians, maintaining French military aircraft while wearing civilian clothes.

                      Then came the disaster of Dien Bien Phu. Here the French begged for U.S. air power to break the deathlock the Viet Minh had on the besieged French garrison. And it almost happened. There are stories of B29s on U.S. bases, wearing French roundals as part of a disguise to convince anybody watching that France had strategic bombers...With American air crews. There was even discussion about using atomic bombs on Viet Minh supply routes,but this was thankfully stopped.

                      When France withdrew from Indochina, it was thought that with the creation of North and South Vietnam the war had ended for good. It was not until the Kennedy Administration that U.S. forces in the form of advisors to the South Vietnam Army that the first 'official' U.S. involvement took place.

                      Kennedy was always against any major units being involved, it's not until the Johnson Administration that you see major deployments of military units. There are unconfirmed reports that Johnson had torn up a Kennedy executive order to withdraw the advisors.

                      So that's your answer, Vietnam was a war we should never have been involved in, in a country that we had no need to be involved with. We were tugged into this war in a vain attempt to prop up a colonia! power trying to relive its glory days, in a wasted effort to stop communist expansion. But perhaps the worst part of the Vietnam War, is that we didn't get to win it, Johnson's efforts led to piecemeal deployments of combat power, with bureaucrats trying to prove that they could fight a war better then the soldiers.
                      Last edited by dragoon500ly; 01-13-2019, 03:32 PM.
                      The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Just realized part of my last post, didn't post...

                        IMO the only way Vietnam could have been avoided, was to have not supported France's efforts to reclaim its former colonies. How this would have impacted U.S.-French relations, probably badly, but looking at how sour relations became after the return of de Gaulle to power...

                        If Kennedy had indeed written his executive order to withdraw advisors, would Johnson have ordered troops into the country What if the Pentagon had advised Johnson to hurt out of military planning and operations

                        In my college days, there was a peace activist attending a round table discussion and he was asked what was the greatest mistake of the peace movement, almost without hesitation, he replied "When we started burning the U.S. flag." When was he was asked to elaborate, "The act of burning the national flag is a call to overthrow the government by any means necessary, That single act drove away all the support that the movement had on both sides, to get our troops out of Vietnam. Did it prolong the war Yes it did, and the blood on both sides are on our hands."

                        I grew up a military brat during Vietnam and I remember the staff cars driving into base housing and seeing the chaplain and a officer walking up to a set of quarters. I still have nightmares of the expressions on the faces of kids i knew.
                        The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by schnickelfritz View Post
                          I am reading "The Generals" by Thomas E. Ricks now and just worked my way through Vietnam and into the 1980's.

                          It's really worth a read, particularly on Vietnam and the aftermath. It made me want to throw the book at the wall...I though I knew how much of a dumba$$ LBJ and Westie were....I had no idea.

                          -Dave
                          The Generals i have read it and its mind blowing

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I did some work on the origins of the Vietnam war when I was in grad school. Could it have been avoided Probably not for political inertia reasons. The first advisers actually deployed to South Vietnam shortly after its creation in the mid-fifties, it wasn't until Kennedy that the deployment became "official" though.

                            At the time the Soviet politicians were emphasizing the spread of communism through insurgency. This factored heavily into Kennedy's decision making around strategy. He wanted to show the Soviets that the United States could stop at the counter-insurgency level, hence, the creation of the Special Forces. Sort of a "whatever you got, we got better" kind of an approach. The US Army, however, had a different vision though. At the time they did not see counter-insurgency as we see it today, they simply viewed it as a "smaller conventional war" and that is how they approached it. So when Truman became President their recommendations were along conventional lines. Truman also suffered from a sort of "little man" syndrome as well. He never really took well to being surrounded by Kennedy's "Best and Brightest" Cabinet Secretaries and advisers. Some say that this played a part in him escalating the war, he needed to show that he was tough.

                            As far as Kennedy's thinking about ending the war and any action Truman may have taken is still a mystery. There are interesting arguments on both sides around that, not sure if we will ever find out what truly happened.

                            On National Guard equipment, I can remember going to the NY State Fair in the early eighties. The Guard troops were there with a M48 tank that had a M60 machine gun mounted on top. I thought the whole display was real cool, especially since they had a zip-line set up to replicate parachutes. The kids were all over that thing. What stands out the most was that they were regularly firing blanks through the M60 to entertain the crowd... that would not go over well these days. Different times.
                            Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Sith, you say Truman. Don't you mean Johnson

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Yes, President Johnson. Sorry, been a long and busy week.
                                Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X