Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

*another* US light tank for T2k?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Sanjuro View Post
    Inherited Traditionally a less formal way of transferring property was involved...
    Well that's what you get when a country is founded from a collection of former prison colonies!
    sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

    Comment


    • #17
      In a T2k setting would these be fundamentally MBTs or organized into TD units
      THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.

      Comment


      • #18
        I've studied WW2 Armored Doctrine...a lot. I've always thought that the US TD doctrine got a lot of M4 Sherman Crewmen Killed. IMHO, the only really useful part of the TD force was to replace the largely static towed AT guns. By 1944, viable ATG's were just too big for reasonable handling, and the 100mm D-10 and 125mm Rapira-3 weapons are 2-3 times the size of the WW2 75mm weapons.

        However, the idea of independent TD unit, attached to light divisions instead of the traditional ID tank battalion or in addition to it to replace the traditional light TOW AT units would have a lot of merit.

        If you could keep the RPG's at a distance and keep what Soviet ATGM's that remain suppressed, the M8/LAV-75/Stingray could have a lot of impact. I bet the infantry sure would like having LCG fire support.

        -Dave

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by raketenjagdpanzer View Post
          In a T2k setting would these be fundamentally MBTs or organized into TD units
          By the final phase of the war (mid-2000 and after), would many forces have the logistical capability to keep "pure" armor units in the field in greater than platoon strength I'd think the combination of fuel and parts issues would restrict most such vehicles, whether actual MBTs or less-armored vehicles, to static defense and reserve roles. To me, it's more likely that anything with a large gun, armor, and movement capability will be used as an assault gun, supporting infantry and horse cavalry with direct fire on enemy strongpoints, unless scouts report the presence of enemy armor. And in that event, the winner may be the stealthier and more fuel-efficient vehicle that can effectively maneuver into a decent ambush position based on those scouts' reports. So, tank destroyer versus tank destroyer duels - duels of the infantry companies' armored champions.

          ... hey, I think I just accidentally advocated for a T2k-era equivalent of the Stryker MGS...

          - C.
          Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996

          Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog.

          It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
          - Josh Olson

          Comment

          Working...
          X