I think one has to bear in mind, too, the circumstances under which the soldier parted from his unit joins another one. Units in combat or even on the move produce stragglers. Stragglers can't always make it back to their original unit. At one end of the spectrum, you have a soldier who was cut off from his unit in 1st Brigade who manages to link up with a unit in 3rd Brigade. His original unit declares him a deserter because no one saw him captured or killed. Word reaches 3rd Brigade, where the soldier has been serving lately. After the nuclear exchange, it's hard to believe this would be counted against the soldier.
On the other hand, you have soldiers who disappear while the unit is in cantonment and not otherwise unduly stressed. When they turn up in civilian garb and get carted back to their unit in handcuffs, obviously a lengthy period in the labor battalion is in store.
I keep coming back to the soldier who finds himself separated from his unit but finds a way to stay in the fight. It would be an annoyance to US commanders to discover an American tanker serving on a British tank crew in 2000. On the other hand, the characterization of his service by the Brits should go a long way towards framing the attitude of the US chain of command that discovers him. If the Brits don't want to give him up, he's likely been doing what a soldier is supposed to be doing for an allied force.
Americans discovered fighting for the other side definitely should be treated as deserters. Maybe that really was the only way to survive. Nonetheless, one makes one's choices.
Enemy deserters are another story entirely. I'm sure when resources exist to vet them, deserters are scrutinized for categorization as assets, enemy agents, or simply unreliable.
On the other hand, you have soldiers who disappear while the unit is in cantonment and not otherwise unduly stressed. When they turn up in civilian garb and get carted back to their unit in handcuffs, obviously a lengthy period in the labor battalion is in store.
I keep coming back to the soldier who finds himself separated from his unit but finds a way to stay in the fight. It would be an annoyance to US commanders to discover an American tanker serving on a British tank crew in 2000. On the other hand, the characterization of his service by the Brits should go a long way towards framing the attitude of the US chain of command that discovers him. If the Brits don't want to give him up, he's likely been doing what a soldier is supposed to be doing for an allied force.
Americans discovered fighting for the other side definitely should be treated as deserters. Maybe that really was the only way to survive. Nonetheless, one makes one's choices.
Enemy deserters are another story entirely. I'm sure when resources exist to vet them, deserters are scrutinized for categorization as assets, enemy agents, or simply unreliable.
Comment