Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GPS and Other Satellites

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Missed on the spelling.
    Oh well, we've learnt something.
    If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

    Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

    Mors ante pudorem

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Rainbow Six View Post
      3RD FOREIGN LEGION
      INFANTRY REGIMENT (REI)
      Subordination: Latin American Regional Command
      Current Location: Kourou
      Manpower: 350
      From wikipedia
      The regiment is composed of around 675 men organised into 5 companies.
      Looks like they've taken about 50% casualties then. That's one hell of a lot for a country not involved in conflict!
      The other units in the command also appear to have suffered very heavily.

      If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

      Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

      Mors ante pudorem

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
        From wikipedia
        Looks like they've taken about 50% casualties then. That's one hell of a lot for a country not involved in conflict!
        The other units in the command also appear to have suffered very heavily.

        https://translate.google.com.au/tran...es&prev=search
        I suppose assuming that their losses are down to casualties is one way of looking at it. Equally possible that they have had personnel detached to serve elsewhere because things were so quiet that it was felt that they could maintain order with 50% of their manpower.

        So once again, up to each individual to interpret the material as they wish - I am not seeing anything written down in a published source that definitively confirms whether the Guiana Space Center is operational or not.
        Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom

        Comment


        • #34
          While it is possible troops were withdrawn, that's still a pretty big reduction. The 33rd for example is down to about 25% and they apparently have the largest area to cover (French speakers/readers please correct me if I'm wrong - google translate is only so good).
          I like to look at it more like the launch facility was attacked in some manner and the 3rd was either caught in the blast/fallout, or was downwind and suffered casualties from toxic chemicals when the rocket fuel went up (or something along those lines). Troops from the other two units were reassigned to make up some of the losses.
          It's equally possible troops were lost in conventional operations against local forces, desertion, disease, starvation, or any number of other causes.

          Regardless of any of the above, it's extremely unlikely the French are going to be allowing anybody else to a) use the facility, no matter what condition it's in, or b) have access to any satellites they may happen to have in operation for any reason.

          In post 2000 good communications would be vital to controlling what's left of the worlds resources. Maintaining a monopoly on this would ensure France's leading position in global matters for decades to come.
          If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

          Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

          Mors ante pudorem

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
            Regardless of any of the above, it's extremely unlikely the French are going to be allowing anybody else to a) use the facility, no matter what condition it's in, or b) have access to any satellites they may happen to have in operation for any reason.

            In post 2000 good communications would be vital to controlling what's left of the worlds resources. Maintaining a monopoly on this would ensure France's leading position in global matters for decades to come.
            Agreed. I've never argued anything to the contrary.
            Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom

            Comment


            • #36
              Given that the French still have units deployed at the Space Center I would think it was definitely intact - there is no mention of any nuclear attacks on the French in South America - and the second version does go into some detail as to what happened in the Caribbean and South America with the only nuclear attacks mentioned being on oil producing areas in the Caribbean (which doesnt apply here) or the minor nuclear war between Argentina and Brazil (again doesnt apply here)

              as to the strength of the French units and how they have been reduced - they would probably have been seeing riot control duty as well as defending the Space Center from those who want to get at any supplies that were there - and you have to remember the Dutch have a Marine battalion in the Caribbean as well - and I could easily see where they might do one heck of a raid to damage the facility or try to to get even for what the French did to them in Europe - keep in mind the Dutch Marines in Europe have been conducting their own sabotage war against the French successfully so why not have their Caribbean battalion join in on the fun

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
                Gateway to the Spanish Main: SSN Corpus Christian
                Last sub series: SSN-705 City of Corpus Christi

                Similar names granted, but definitely different.


                Nothing to say that didn't get hit. Remember the strike list(s) only detail warheads of 0.5 MT or greater with only a few specific exceptions. Note also the last scout was launched in 1994 and the design retired. It also had a very small payload.


                First point, with it's relative proximity to the US, and the previously established targeting of important facilities in neutral countries, do you really think this wouldn't have been hit by the Soviets
                Secondly, even if it did survive, the French are militantly neutral and not sharing anything with either side. They're not going to be launching anything for anyone (even if they retain the capability during the course of the war, which is doubtful), and they're also not going to be allowing anyone to use what little they've got already up.
                Also, not only Soviet and US satellites are going to be targeted and taken out. Anything in orbit it likely to be attacked, if not by a direct strike, then by shrapnel from previous attacks. While attacks are ongoing, and until it can be deemed relatively safe, nobody's going to risk sending anything up. It's not like putting up a cheap weather balloon - these things are EXPENSIVE!!!


                The Japanese aren't launching anything for the same reasons as the French. Also, during and post war (for a few years at least) they're not likely to have the raw materials and other resources to do it anyway - there's a reason why the Japanese expanded into the rest of Asia and the Pacific in the 1930's and early 40's. They just don't have many natural sources of raw materials at home.
                Even if Japan hasn't been nuked (and why would the Soviets and North Koreans ignore all those US targets https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...ent_facilities), they've still got a huge (for the land size) population to try and feed. Starvation, rioting, etc would be a real problem, effectively stopping attempts at launching anything.
                I wont argue much on the sub but again it shows a classic example of how GDW guys may have not been talking to each other to coordinate their stories - because the sub in question sank the Cuban ship in late 2000 - which according to Last Submarine there werent any US subs left to sink that ship by 2000 - remember they grabbed the supposedly last sub a long time before that

                As I have said in another thread that was one reason my GM had the sub from the Last Submarine still in US hands but with a non-functional fire system (meaning its basically useless) and the UBF having her sister sub that was mentioned as having disappeared on her last cruise - made more sense as to how the two modules interacted - but thats a different argument entirely

                I would think that given how much information there is on Maryland and Virginia in the modules and Challenge that a nuclear attack on Wallops would have been mentioned for sure - the authors detailed every other US launch site as well as the Soviet ones being taken out - so leaving out the French one and Wallops may have been intentional as was Kagoshima - i.e. great material for future stories on sending out characters to retrieve technology

                as for the French launching anything - if anyone still has the ability to build satellites its them - and again we aren't talking state of the art here - the tech to build the satellites of the 1960's and 70's would still be available to them - and considering they are one of the few nations that still have forces deployed worldwide they would need functional communication satellites if only one or two

                Comment


                • #38
                  It may have been intentional but without one of the GDW staffers to confirm that we will never know. There's an equal chance it may have been simply missed (for example, Wallops became part of the Goddard Space Flight Centre in 1981 so the GDW crew may have been thinking of it as part of Goddards) or it may have been one of those sites hit with a smaller warhead, it may have been hit by other means (e.g. sub-launched conventional warhead, special forces raids or other exotics) or it may have been intended for a later adventure scenario and as mentioned by GDW themselves, they intentionally did not list the entire nuclear arsenal of each side as being used because they decided to leave some for individual GMs to use as they saw fit to enhance their own games, that is to say, they deliberately left some targets and they deliberately left some warheads so that the GMs could tailor the attacks to their own games.
                  Last edited by StainlessSteelCynic; 01-09-2016, 05:12 PM. Reason: grammar corrections

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    the biggest problem with this debate is one key fact. by 1998 per V1 or V2 cannon nothing would be able to survive in any of the low or mid earth orbits. between debris from ASAT hits, nuclear intercepts, lost satellites from EMP. the world would be looking at severe Kessler Syndrome. the magnitude of this would ground any attempts at launches for several decades at the earliest and even then only high earth and geosynchronous orbits would likely be feasible.
                    the best course of action when all is against you is to slow down and think critically about the situation. this way you are not blindly rushing into an ambush and your mind is doing something useful rather than getting you killed.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by bobcat View Post
                      ...only high earth and geosynchronous orbits would likely be feasible.
                      And even GETTING there would be extremely risky!
                      If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

                      Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

                      Mors ante pudorem

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I did kinda hint at the problem with space debris in one of my earlier comments but I didn't think the problem would be quite so bad!
                        So irrespective of usable rockets that are conveniently near enough to the launch pad and irrespective of the willingness to commit vital resources to an endeavour that has extremely limited usage and low rates of success, there's unlikely to be any way to bypass the debris field until a nation is in a position to actually clean up the low- and mid-range orbits.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
                          Sheesh, that means the situation with GPS satellites would be even worse than the info I found!
                          One day would be enough to make it worthless as a navigational aid so the USA and its allies better remember their map & compass nav skills
                          There is an uneven trend to correct the reliance on digital navigation. Not just the military, but civil aviation as well. Uneven because the U.S. started with aviation and armor. 11B are personal initiative of the training nco's and officers. This was from discussions, reading various articles and is by no means "scientific".

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Shame it's about 20 years too late for T2K...
                            If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

                            Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

                            Mors ante pudorem

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Rainbow Six View Post
                              So there is a large contingent of Foreign Legion troops in the vicinity of the site of the Guiana Space Centre and another large contingent of French troops in the capital of French Guiana.
                              Hmm, that certainly does suggest that either the space launch facility is intact, or there's enough left that the French think it's worth protecting with a considerable investment of manpower.
                              sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by kato13 View Post
                                The next paragraph radically changes the context of the quotes as far as this discussion goes.
                                Whoops

                                Originally posted by kato13
                                Given how important the GPS system is I could see MILGOV sacrificing quite a bit to make sure they can update them twice a year. Don't know how long they could keep them working but they would sure try.

                                In my world the GPS system would be some where between useless (If ASATs or EMP were really effective), to only being able to provide accurate time (if say 3 or 4 are alive) , to the least likely option partially functional (with like 8 sats working properly, like during the deployment for "desert shield").

                                If you say you can only get a link for 4 hours every 4 days that could be a useful plot device. You could even have a few sats giving out erroneous information so if you check during other times you get totally wrong information.
                                Sounds reasonable.
                                sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X