Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

T2K Cover Art

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • T2K Cover Art

    I don't think we've ever had a thread devoted to Twilight 2000 cover art. What's your favorite What do you like about it Are there any covers that you can't stand

    I must confess that there are ulterior motives behind this thread. My Korea Sourcebook is nearing completion and I need a cover- something in the vein of the v1.0 adventure modules and/or sourcebooks. All I can offer in return is the cover art credit on the title page but, if you're interested and able, please PM me.
    40
    Airlords of the Ozarks
    0%
    0
    Allegheny Uprising
    0%
    0
    Armies of the Night
    0%
    1
    Black Madonna
    0%
    0
    Boomer
    0%
    1
    Free City of Krakow
    0%
    6
    Gateway to the Spanish Main
    0%
    1
    Going Home
    0%
    4
    Howling Wilderness
    0%
    2
    Kindapped
    0%
    0
    King's Ransom
    0%
    0
    Last Submarine
    0%
    1
    Mediterranean Cruise
    0%
    0
    Pirates of the Vistula
    0%
    11
    Red Star Lone Star
    0%
    4
    Ruins of Warsaw
    0%
    0
    Satellite Down
    0%
    1
    Small Arms Guide
    0%
    0
    Urban Guerilla
    0%
    2
    Other: Please specify
    0%
    6
    Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

    https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
    https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
    https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
    https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
    https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

  • #2
    Going Home is just so damn evocative.

    Honorable mention to the Gazetteer for Merc: 2000, though. It's got a "we're gonna go places and do stuff" vibe that I appreciate, and the tangent-sighted Hi-Power is a bonus.

    - C.
    Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996

    Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog.

    It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
    - Josh Olson

    Comment


    • #3
      The face on the Going Home cover dude was clearly modelled after Jimmy Page (Led Zeppelin guitarist) c.84. Every time I see it I wonder what he's doing in the U.S. Army.

      I really like Challenge #35. I think it captures the essence of Twilight 2000 better than any other piece of cover art that I've seen.
      Last edited by Raellus; 01-05-2018, 08:23 AM.
      Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

      https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
      https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
      https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
      https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
      https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

      Comment


      • #4
        I'll never forget seeing Red Star Line Star at Hobby Haven in 1986-my first thought was "Wolverines!"

        Comment


        • #5
          I voted "Other".

          As much as I like the 1st Edition box set cover, I'm with Raellus. Challenge #35 was always my "go-to" image when I was talking to gamers about T2k. It's undoubtedly my fav image for the game.

          Challenge #35

          Comment


          • #6
            I agree Challenge 35 has the classic Twilight 2000 feel to it. A US vehicle and crew along with (based on the uniforms) West and East German and a Russian soldiers tagging along.

            Comment


            • #7
              [QUOTE=Ewan;76768]I agree Challenge 35 has the classic Twilight 2000 feel to it. A US vehicle and crew along with (based on the uniforms) West and East German and a Russian soldiers tagging along.[/QUOT
              I think #35 is a good cover as well.

              Comment


              • #8
                I always thought one of those WarPac guys was Polish

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
                  I always thought one of those WarPac guys was Polish
                  The guy in the foreground is probably East German, based on the helmet resting on the crate at his side.

                  The guy with the chickens is harder to place. He looks like he's wearing U.S. WWII-era "Duckhunter" pattern cammies (also used in Korea and Vietnam). It doesn't really look very much like any Warsaw Pact camouflage pattern (Bulgarian is the closest but it uses more angular blotches) that I know of.

                  The closest match that I could find on Camopedia was this:

                  "Polish military parachute shrouds for special operations (vice standard airborne operations, which have always been white) have been printed with a unique spot pattern (also nicknamed Żaba or "frog") since the 1960s. This pattern, its design incorporating black and orange spots on a pale green background, became popular with Polish airborne and special operations personnel, who cannibalized the parachutes and had one and two-piece customs uniforms created out of them. Although not officially produced by the government, these privately obtained uniforms remain in use well into the present era."

                  -
                  Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

                  https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
                  https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
                  https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
                  https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
                  https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Cover of the 1st Ed box set. The stark nature of the art, and the eyes of the subjecfs It says it all.
                    Author of "Distant Winds of a Forgotten World" available now as part of the Cannon Publishing Military Sci-Fi / Fantasy Anthology: Spring 2019 (Cannon Publishing Military Anthology Book 1)

                    "Red Star, Burning Streets" by Cavalier Books, 2020

                    https://epochxp.tumblr.com/ - EpochXperience - Contributing Blogger since October 2020. (A Division of SJR Consulting).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jason Weiser View Post
                      Cover of the 1st Ed box set. The stark nature of the art, and the eyes of the subjecfs It says it all.
                      Plus the weapons! A MK19! An M60! And a drum magazine on an M16!

                      I had to know more!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Ancestor View Post
                        Plus the weapons! A MK19! An M60! And a drum magazine on an M16!

                        I had to know more!
                        Author of "Distant Winds of a Forgotten World" available now as part of the Cannon Publishing Military Sci-Fi / Fantasy Anthology: Spring 2019 (Cannon Publishing Military Anthology Book 1)

                        "Red Star, Burning Streets" by Cavalier Books, 2020

                        https://epochxp.tumblr.com/ - EpochXperience - Contributing Blogger since October 2020. (A Division of SJR Consulting).

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          That's perfect! As an aside, as bad as that movie was, I find it horribly entertaining.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I went for 'Pirates'
                            Originally posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
                            Challenge #35
                            But this was what got me playing

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I re-read parts of this thread after ChalkLine posted and I wanted to ask a question about American English. Now I am in no way trying to be the grammar police or trying to derail this thread but the use of this particular word caused me some confusion when I first read it in a post and it did the same when I read it again a few minutes ago.

                              The word in question is "vice". It's being used instead othe word "versus" and again, I bring this up because use of "vice" caused me a few minutes of head shaking until I figured out what was meant.
                              When did vice start being used instead of versus This is the quote that Raellus used in his post: -
                              Camopedia
                              "Polish military parachute shrouds for special operations (vice standard airborne operations, which have always been white)..."

                              I can understand if the use of vice is to shorten the term vice versa but if so, it's still incorrect use of the word vice, vice versa meaning the reverse order of what has been stated and vice itself having several meanings, none of which mean versus/in contrast to.

                              So yeah, when I see vice used in the context it was on the camopedia entry whatever concept the writer is trying to portay is obscured until I remember it's being used instead of versus. Versus is only two letters longer so it surely can't be for the ease of typing/writing
                              So my question is when & why did the use of vice instead of versus become the norm in American English Or is it the norm Is it just used by some people and not universally accepted in American English

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X