Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Twilight 2025

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Raellus View Post
    And the US Army will soon be rolling out it's first new standard-issue assault rifle in 65 years.



    In 6.8mm no less!

    -
    Maybe. I'm not holding my breath. I remember the last two times they promised us new firearms.
    I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

    Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

    Comment


    • For unit organization, this page has a good overview of how Russia's Battalion Tactical Groups are organized on paper. I suspect a lot of them add a third artillery battery. Msta-S and Grad should be most common, just based on existing numbers.
      The poster formerly known as The Dark

      The Vespers War - Ninety years before the Twilight War, there was the Vespers War.

      Comment


      • When was the BTG concept adopted

        Comment


        • NATO Noobs

          It looks like Finland and Sweden are closer than ever to joining NATO. It'll be interesting (and potentially very scary) to see how this plays out.

          -
          Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

          https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
          https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
          https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
          https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
          https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

          Comment


          • Originally posted by mpipes View Post
            When was the BTG concept adopted
            The first Battalion Tactical Groups were formed in 2013. With just 1,000 men, they are on the "light" side in manning and I would compare their function with the US Calvary (both the Air Cav & Armored Cav) in that they reduce manning in the hope of increasing tactical maneuverability and flexibility. However, it now appears that BGTs do NOT have the tactical flexibility that we thought due to their inability to "shoot, move, and communicate" effectively. They also lack the troop density (Infantry) for urban warfare... just like US Cav units which "do more with less" by leveraging airpower and artillery to break up enemy troop concentrations.

            I believe the BTG was adopted due to "manning issues" in the Russian Army. Because of their structure (no NCO corps to control the enlisted) they can only control units of a certain size effectively. In theory, by having a "combined arms unit" of 1,000 men, junior officers can just "dispatch" BTGs towards objectives without having to "micromanage" them in combat. In practice, the lack of training in the Russian Army makes the BTG ineffective.

            Comment


            • Another thing with later war dates is the loss of networks and GPS, something likely to affect younger folk, if properly expressed in game.

              Comment

              Working...
              X