Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Korea OPLAN late 1980's (Prior to 1988 & No NATO Contigencies)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Korea OPLAN late 1980's (Prior to 1988 & No NATO Contigencies)

    IX Corps
    2 ID
    7 ID (L)
    25 ID (L)

    III MEF
    3 Marine D
    - 1 MEB
    - 9 MEB
    - 9 RCT

    I Corps
    9 ID (Mtz)
    40 ID (M)
    29 IB
    41 IB
    81 IB (M)
    116 ACR

  • #2
    Originally posted by Louied View Post
    IX Corps
    2 ID
    7 ID (L)
    25 ID (L)

    III MEF
    3 Marine D
    - 1 MEB
    - 9 MEB
    - 9 RCT

    I Corps
    9 ID (Mtz)
    40 ID (M)
    29 IB
    41 IB
    81 IB (M)
    116 ACR
    Is this a T2K OPLAN or a RL OPLAN Because if it is supposed to be a RL OPLAN, it's very wrong. Unfortunately, due to security considerations, I cannot correct you for a RL OPLAN.
    Last edited by pmulcahy11b; 10-28-2020, 10:41 AM. Reason: Misspelling
    I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

    Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Paul,
      I gleaned it from this.... https://history.army.mil/html/books/...H%2040-1-1.pdf
      The second major non-European contingency plan requiring a corps- level Army commitment augmented the forward-deployed 2d Infantry Division in Korea in the event of localized hostilities there. This plan called for the 25th Infantry Division, the 7th Infantry Division, the 9th Infantry Division (Motorized), an Army National Guard mechanized infantry division, and four Army National Guard independent infantry brigades to fight in Korea.8 Even without simultaneous operations in all theaters, Army commitments exceeded available forces.9

      I pulled the Marines from other sources and I could only find three ARNG Inf Bdes that I could confirm Korea OPLAN contingencies, I rolled the dice on 116 ACR because I found one source stating that.

      Paul, its been 30 plus years now, surely We can get something, at least units which had Korean contingencies

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Louied View Post
        Paul,


        Paul, its been 30 plus years now, surely We can get something, at least units which had Korean contingencies
        No one in an official capacity has told me that anything I learned of a classified nature has been declassified. Until then...
        I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

        Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

        Comment

        Working...
        X