Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What's the AV of a rucksack?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What's the AV of a rucksack?

    Throughout history since vehicles came into heavy use, troops have hung their personal gear outside of the vehicle or put them in bustle racks. This serves two purposes: to clear out the cramped interior, and to protect the vehicle a bit.

    The second one is what I'm talking about. It's been discovered in Iraq that simple things like personal gear can pre-detonate HEAT rounds. So what's the AV of a rucksack A box of MREs Someone's boom box etc
    I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

    Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

  • #2
    Originally posted by pmulcahy11b
    The second one is what I'm talking about. It's been discovered in Iraq that simple things like personal gear can pre-detonate HEAT rounds. So what's the AV of a rucksack A box of MREs Someone's boom box etc
    AV 0, most likely. Just functions as (probably not very effective) standoff armor.
    A generous and sadistic GM,
    Brandon Cope

    http://copeab.tripod.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Actually... Rucksacks have been known to stop bullets of up to 7.62mm caliber. But i'm not sure what AV that would be classified as.
      Fuck being a hero. Do you know what you get for being a hero? Nothing! You get shot at. You get a little pat on the back, blah blah blah, attaboy! You get divorced... Your wife can't remember your last name, your kids don't want to talk to you... You get to eat a lot of meals by yourself. Trust me kid, nobody wants to be that guy. I do this because there is nobody else to do it right now. Believe me if there was somebody else to do it, I would let them do it. There's not, so I'm doing it.

      Comment


      • #4
        I would think the average for a full pack would end up being the same or a little less than a sand bag. Of course it depends on contents.
        Last edited by kato13; 07-03-2009, 09:50 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by kato13
          I would think the average for a full pack would end up being the same or a little less than a sand bag. Of course it depends on contents.
          probably more like a sandbag if the content was sand

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by leonpoi
            probably more like a sandbag if the content was sand
            My assumption was that is was twice as thick. Packed clothing can have a density of 400 kg/M^3 and my overall average for military/personal equipment is 700kg/M^3. Sand is about 1800kg depending on how wet it is.
            Last edited by kato13; 07-03-2009, 11:19 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              premature detonation of heat rounds

              causes the jet of molten copper from the round to disperse in a patern that greatly lessens the effects of it . I would deduct a few points from total penetration value if rounds went of in objects outside the armor hull. Sort of like a spaced armor variety .

              In Jugoslavia we saw vehicles modified to withstand heat rounds and rpgs with cement,tiles,car tyres,chickenwire and of course the good old tank tracks across the hull.

              Being a former crew man and cavalry man my self I would be damned before I had any of my ill begotten gains put into expensive gear riddled with shrapnel on the outside of the APC .

              Though - on the M135 ( M113 w 2o mm turret ) we had , all our packs were stowed in what we called the cangaroo pouch . A huge canvas pouch strapped to the front of the tin can.

              Mostly issue gear back then though - I guess the shooting company would replace from their budget .But rolling out a sleeping bag with hits from mg fire and shrapnel in an ice cold tent at night after a scrap would probably dent morale pretty good.

              Lack of space inside was the reason for stowing outside though .

              Comment


              • #8
                AV on a rucksac....

                Paul that's the best one yet.....LOL (how long is a string of string)

                I'd guess it would depend of what's in it...

                If it's packed with Iron or gold bars for some reason it would be pretty good
                on the other hand
                if its packed with dirty dipers som vials of the plague , a faulty frag , a bottle of acid, 3 molotov cocktails and a pund of heroin...well that would be a interily different matter...

                all IMHO offcourse
                The Big Book of War - Twilight 2000 Filedump Site
                Guns don't kill people,apes with guns do.

                Comment


                • #9
                  he

                  Originally posted by General Pain
                  Paul that's the best one yet.....LOL (how long is a string of string)

                  I'd guess it would depend of what's in it...

                  If it's packed with Iron or gold bars for some reason it would be pretty good
                  on the other hand
                  if its packed with dirty dipers som vials of the plague , a faulty frag , a bottle of acid, 3 molotov cocktails and a pund of heroin...well that would be a interily different matter...

                  all IMHO offcourse
                  that reads like your PCs equipment list .( All firearms are carried on his person )

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I am guessing they would do a good job at protecting against low velocity stuff, pistols, shrapnel and maybe full sized mg and assault rifle rounds when they are near their max range and more or less spent.

                    But, the contents of the pack well, think about what we stuffed in the packs. A shelter half, 1 spare uniform, the boots if you carried extra may stop a round. But most things nope, they just contribute to stopping things.

                    One of the big reasons we put packs on the outside was room, so we could cram more guys in the truck. And so our packs are more accessible than just tossing them in the bed cramping your knees, rattling around, then the confusion of whose pack is whose when its time to off load. We had two trucks bog down on the drive to the city so in the end we have almost two platoons stuffed in the back of 1 duece, the bench seats were filled and then two rows of packs along the bed guys sat on.

                    So there is another reason for strapping them a lack of confusion and ease of access when you need them.
                    "God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by General Pain
                      if its packed with dirty dipers som vials of the plague , a faulty frag , a bottle of acid, 3 molotov cocktails and a pund of heroin...well that would be a interily different matter...
                      That leads to the inevitable question: why is your PC carrying those things around -- especially the dirty diapers
                      I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

                      Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by General Pain
                        I'd guess it would depend of what's in it...
                        Yes, we should be asking: What's the AV of a can of Spam
                        A generous and sadistic GM,
                        Brandon Cope

                        http://copeab.tripod.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by copeab
                          Yes, we should be asking: What's the AV of a can of Spam
                          It's quite dense. It's the real secret behind Chobham.
                          I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

                          Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by pmulcahy11b
                            It's quite dense. It's the real secret behind Chobham.

                            C =3
                            H = 8
                            O = 15
                            B = 2
                            H = 8
                            A = 1
                            M = 13
                            -----------
                            Tot= 50

                            S = 19
                            P = 16
                            A = 1
                            M = 13
                            --------------
                            Tot = 49

                            Pretty close. You might be on to something.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'm straping cans of SPAM to the LAV 25....Cheap fix at AV 49. Don't tell the Brits' Python fans will come out of the woodwork.
                              Military intelligence is a oxymoron

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X