Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fiddle's Green

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Panther Al View Post
    True, but that (at least according to the cav) was because the infantry branch got all pissy that someone might get something special, after all, the infantry is the only bunch that gets promotion points for proving they know how to do their job...

    But in all seriousness, yes, the M3 was called the Bradley, but to a lot of cavalry men its still the Devers- at least to the old timers- the new crop over the past 10 years hasn't heard about its old name..
    It was Devers when I left the service...so shoot me (wait, that's been done)!!!

    Besides...infantry officers tended to tear up and throw hissy fits when cav was attached to their units...it was that cocky, know-it-all atitude that comes with the knowledge that in a real fight, with armored cavalry...infantry was just another name for "track lubricant"!!!
    The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
      Besides...infantry officers tended to tear up and throw hissy fits when cav was attached to their units...it was that cocky, know-it-all atitude that comes with the knowledge that in a real fight, with armored cavalry...infantry was just another name for "track lubricant"!!!
      Hey, I resent that remark, and I'm Dragon-qualified...
      I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

      Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
        Hey, I resent that remark, and I'm Dragon-qualified...
        LOL...I never present my backside to a Dragon!

        Besides, haven't you ever wondered why infantry are called "crunchies" by tankers
        The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
          LOL...I never present my backside to a Dragon!

          Besides, haven't you ever wondered why infantry are called "crunchies" by tankers
          Yeah, well I would be afraid of friendly fire too!

          No I wouldn't want be an Infantryman assigned to anything closely resembling an Armor unit for said reasons. They have very limited field of vision, the again so do Dragoon gunner who are only looking through their sights. So yeah I can understand them not wanted to expose their back side to some rocket troop looking through an only noticing that they tanks are 'leaving' the engagement area...lol

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
            In the mid to late 80s, the armd cav platoon replaced two M113 Dragon tracks with two M-901 Improved Tow Vehicles...not exactly the best choice for the recon mission!

            Towards the end of the eighties, with the first deployment of the M3 Devers CFV, the ACRs started a major reorganization of the platoons.

            First tested in the 1986 REFORGER, the structure was 1st & 2nd Platoons, using a command M113, 3 M-901s and 3 M113 Dragons apeice (splitting the Third Herds scout section) and giving up their tank sections to 3rd Platoon...12 M-1s!
            3rd platoon would have 12 M1s....WOW the platoon would have as much firepower minus the HQ section of a regular Armor Company...lol

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
              Hey, I resent that remark, and I'm Dragon-qualified...
              Hrm.... The Dragon. You mean that missile that had a minimum range closer to its max than not, the one that had a "slight" problem with CATO issues, that would sometime fly right into the ground, and the one that when the russians copied it, significantly improved on it to the point that the pip was a copy of the russian redesign

              Now if you said TOW on the otherhand....
              Last edited by Panther Al; 12-25-2010, 07:31 PM.
              Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

              Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.

              Comment


              • #22
                Paul no matter what we may say. I have the feeling we will be wrong because we could jump out of perfectly flying Air Farce plane with one...lol

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Abbott Shaull View Post
                  Paul no matter what we may say. I have the feeling we will be wrong because we could jump out of perfectly flying Air Farce plane with one...lol
                  How many times do I have to say that I don't know those planes are perfectly good because they're Air Force planes!
                  I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

                  Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Panther Al View Post
                    Hrm.... The Dragon. You mean that missile that had a minimum range closer to its max than not, the one that had a "slight" problem with CATO issues, that would sometime fly right into the ground, and the one that when the russians copied it, significantly improved on it to the point that the pip was a copy of the russian redesign

                    Now if you said TOW on the otherhand....
                    The point being that I could pop your fancy Cav vehicle in the patoot... And the minimum range is only 60 meters. And grounding your missile is a rookie mistake.

                    And yes, I did botch my only combat shot with a Dragon, hitting the BMP-1 near one of the front roadwheels...
                    I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

                    Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
                      How many times do I have to say that I don't know those planes are perfectly good because they're Air Force planes!
                      Yeah I know what you mean there is no such thing as perfect Air Force plane. They were piloted by the best pilots put through the best training known in the f'Free' world... So damn right I wanted to be qualified to deplane in hurry...lol

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
                        How many times do I have to say that I don't know those planes are perfectly good because they're Air Force planes!
                        Now that is a very good point: at least with the sh!thook you know if its leaking its fine, when it stops it must be out of fluids.

                        (And by the way, don't ask the crew to see the leeks before you get on, they don't find it very funny. )
                        Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

                        Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I don't understand why not...lol Just keep an eye where the crew chief is looking at...lol

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            and again i am reminded how much of an oxymoron i am.
                            the dismounted rider(AKA light cavalry)

                            gimmie a radio, my M4 and a division of hostle armor(or as us light guys call them targets)
                            the best course of action when all is against you is to slow down and think critically about the situation. this way you are not blindly rushing into an ambush and your mind is doing something useful rather than getting you killed.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              lol @ the crunchies
                              "There is only one tactical principal which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wounds, death and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time."
                              --General George S. Patton, Jr.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Abbott Shaull View Post
                                3rd platoon would have 12 M1s....WOW the platoon would have as much firepower minus the HQ section of a regular Armor Company...lol
                                Tell me about it! To the best of my knowledge, it was only pulled on that one REFORGER with mixed results (gee wonder why). That's why the next move in the troop was to go to four line platoons, two with 6 M3 each and two with 4 M1A1s apiece. This is the configuration that went into Desert Storm.
                                The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X