Something that always struck me odd,....

[Abbott Shaull]

You know after watch show on the military channel about the Marine Reserve Aviation unit assigned to Afghanistan.

Well you know back in the barracks in the armory, at least for the Infantry unit there was enough M16s for everyone in the company. I mean on range days everyone from Machine gunners, AT gunners, and SAW Gunners would draw out M16s.

After watching the show noticing that the pilots were carrying what looked like M4s or some similar short barrel variant of the M16/AR15 around camp. When a unit were in say their bases, would the everyone carry a common weapon, turning in the likes of SAW and M60/M240 into some type of armory. I am not talking about temporary bases, but established bases where Machine gun emplacements have been worked out as well AT tank position where people don't need to carry weapons all of the time.

Also how many shotguns would be in Company size unit I mean by t2k these weapons could be used both for hunting purpose and close-quarter fighting. I can even see at Company level or higher having some hunting rifles for the same purpose. So as not to waste military ammo for game hunting.

How many non-authorized side-arms and abundant amount of SMG Would troops who didn't have need or regular be issued side arms and/or Submachine guns would they be allowed to "borrow" them from elsewhere and keep them. Especially troops that Assault Rifles or Battle Rifle that have been in lot of urban built area fighting, might accept the extra weight for peace of mind having something they can handle more readily than their regular weapons. I mean the Machine gunner are issued side-arms for reason of self-defense at close range, but I can see them using them at times while clearing a house for use of outpost later where you don't want to tear it up too badly if you do find previous 'owners' still in residence.

Any thoughts

[Legbreaker]

From my own experience, you carried the weapon you were issued with whether that be a rifle or machinegun.
If the machinegun for some reason had to be left on the perimeter, then you borrowed the rifle of the person who was behind the gun at that time.
You NEVER went unarmed unless you'd handed your weapon into the armoury (when meant you were well out of danger anyway).

[Arrissen]

This all really depends on the unit, the setting and the current risk level as to who carries what and these days alot more money has been thrown at front line units. This means that yeah, some pilots will carry carbines or sub-carbines or an SMG in addition to their issue sidearm i.e. the US Army's 160th SOAR do this. These guys support SF units and are trained and authorised to do so in case they get shot down and have to put their SERE training into effect. Most modern troops on bases deployed overseas whether it's a main base or forward operating base (FOB) are required to carry their issued weapons with them at all times for security reasons. And that means for both base security reasons and for their own personal security. Besides, they have signed for their weapon(s) and will be held responsible for them. This is why you see guys standing in the chow line or whatever maybe dressed lightly but still armed, and if they're not for some good reason i.e. they're in hostpital, then their weapons will be locked away and re-issued to them later.

The more funding a unit has the more availability there will be for things (some would say luxuries) like sidearms and shotguns. For example, SF units get the most funding so an operator will be issued, as standard, a primary weapon and a secondry weapon (a sidearm). During close quarters battle (CQB) they are trained to immediately quick transition to their secondry weapon if their primary weapon fails to fire in order to maintain a good volume of fire. Remember, they work in small teams and so in a firefight they need as many rounds going down range as possible. They talk to eachother and state what they're their doing so their shooting partner/ team will know what's happening so as to maintain good spatial awareness. They will then take cover if or when they can and reload. When operating in built up areas they will carry at least one shotgun per squad, but this is more for breaching hard points i.e. locked doors than for actual fighting, although they can get used for this if necessary and of course as stated, they're good for hunting. Marine units are moving toward this same sort of system but historically have received the least funding and have therefore been required to do more with less, so not everyone will say be issued a sidearm.

Shotguns may be in scarce supply. MP's and security units routinely employ the use of shotguns and may issue them as a primary weapon but usually supported by someone else carrying a rifle, carbine or SMG, with both people working/ moving together as a two-man team. As for non-issue weapons being used, this would be more common in T2K IMO given the dire situation, rather than in a real world setting, but it would once again depend on the unit, standing orders on such things and the current level of discipline. Modern well-trained units use task specific equipment in order to maximise their chances of sucessfully completing their mission. It's not so much about what they'd like to carry.

As a player I always found that you could carry whatever you liked within reason, but still prefered to maintain my original issue weapon(s) out of a sense of personal pride and satisfaction, and also in order to maintain compatibility of ammunition type(s) with my team mates, so as to increase our overall battlefield effectiveness as a team. I hope this helps.

[Targan]

As a player I always found that you could carry whatever you liked within reason, but still prefered to maintain my original issue weapon(s) out of a sense of personal pride and satisfaction, and also in order to maintain compatibility of ammunition type(s) with my team mates, so as to increase our overall battlefield effectiveness as a team.

So what was Wolfgang Heckler's issue weapon again An EZ-curl bar and disc weights

[Arrissen]

True he wasn't even in the military, was he A cat buglar if I recall. Ba ha ha

[dragoon500ly]

For an infantry company, its surprising the number of different weapons that you would find in the arms rooms. I've seen everything from M-21s to Remington 870s to M1911A1s (years after the blessed Berretta cursed our Army), M-16A1s (years after they were supposed to be turned in for conversion), M-60s and M240s....even M202s.

NCOs were always being pulled for inspections, and it always seemed that some field-grade officer had signed the paperwork for an exception to TO&E.

[Legbreaker]

Pistols in the armoury! :O
Our entire Battalion had a grand total of just 9 pistols, all 9mmP's which I never even got to lay eyes on!
We did have a variety of weaponry scattered through the 8() armouries though:
L1A1 SLRs, M16A1s, F1 SMGs, M79s, M203s, M60's, a couple of .303 Brens, Martini Henry rifles (100+ years old), Mark 4 SMLEs, and, so I've been led to believe, a couple of .55 Boys AT rifles. Now that's something I'd like as a sidearm! :P

[dragoon500ly]

Yup! And that was just an infantry company...

An armor company with loads of pistols, both Berettas and M-1911A1s as well as a dozen S&W .38, M-3 and M-3A1 submachine guns, M-16A1s, even a handful of M-177 carbines...both does that date me!!!! I could never figure out why the armory had a pair of M-67 90mm recoilless rifles.

Our forward ammo point was even more weird. 105mm ammo in every type and variety, APDS, APDSDU, APDSFSDU, HEAT, HEP, Beehive and WP (the only place I've ever seen 105mm tank WP!). Metal and plastic AT mines, bouncing bettys, claymores, toe poppers, every hand grenade that the US had in service for the last 20 years...and then the weird stuff; all kinds of nifty demo stuff to destroy the ole kaserne...55 gallon drums lined with incendary mixture to destroy that nasty ole paper, cutting charges, C4 by the pallet load....AND WE NEVER HAD A CHANCE TO USE ANY OF THE GOOD STUFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Legbreaker]

Which is probably a good thing since you'd have probably been on the receiving end of similar "good stuff".

[Panther Al]

Pistols in the armoury! :O
Our entire Battalion had a grand total of just 9 pistols, all 9mmP's which I never even got to lay eyes on!
We did have a variety of weaponry scattered through the 8() armouries though:
L1A1 SLRs, M16A1s, F1 SMGs, M79s, M203s, M60's, a couple of .303 Brens, Martini Henry rifles (100+ years old), Mark 4 SMLEs, and, so I've been led to believe, a couple of .55 Boys AT rifles. Now that's something I'd like as a sidearm! :P

Heh, only four We had more M9 pistols in our armoury than Rifles - one of the (dis)advantages of being an armoured cav unit I guess. Of course, we always got a laugh when Regiment would do a arms room inventory and count up one extra M2 HMG. They would freak, yell, and scream, until we point out that the extra M2 was a personally owned M2 being stored in the arms room. Then they would freak, yell, and scream, about the very idea of a Spec having the balls (And the money) to own one.

[Abbott Shaull]

Heh, only four We had more M9 pistols in our armoury than Rifles - one of the (dis)advantages of being an armoured cav unit I guess. Of course, we always got a laugh when Regiment would do a arms room inventory and count up one extra M2 HMG. They would freak, yell, and scream, until we point out that the extra M2 was a personally owned M2 being stored in the arms room. Then they would freak, yell, and scream, about the very idea of a Spec having the balls (And the money) to own one.

A Spec who didn't spend much time out of the barracks...lol

[Abbott Shaull]

Yup! And that was just an infantry company...

An armor company with loads of pistols, both Berettas and M-1911A1s as well as a dozen S&W .38, M-3 and M-3A1 submachine guns, M-16A1s, even a handful of M-177 carbines...both does that date me!!!! I could never figure out why the armory had a pair of M-67 90mm recoilless rifles.

Our forward ammo point was even more weird. 105mm ammo in every type and variety, APDS, APDSDU, APDSFSDU, HEAT, HEP, Beehive and WP (the only place I've ever seen 105mm tank WP!). Metal and plastic AT mines, bouncing bettys, claymores, toe poppers, every hand grenade that the US had in service for the last 20 years...and then the weird stuff; all kinds of nifty demo stuff to destroy the ole kaserne...55 gallon drums lined with incendary mixture to destroy that nasty ole paper, cutting charges, C4 by the pallet load....AND WE NEVER HAD A CHANCE TO USE ANY OF THE GOOD STUFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Was this when the Regiment still had the original M1 or had they already been upgrade to M1A1s

Interesting thing when I was in basic, I had got in argument with MS NG who would have swore their M177s at the time were M4 that were still in development stage. I bet if he was still in he would notice the difference now.

You know it like the old web bearing equipment with pistol belt, and either Y or H yoke with attachments. There was so much of it made, and even in the surplus system it took years for the MOLLE system to get authorized and then into the system. Almost 20 years from when it was first started to be introduced to units for testing.

Yeah we had mixture of M1911A1s and the Berrettas.

Well that were those recoilless rifles were misplaced. Knowing how the Military never gets rid of anything, I am sure their was ammo stored somewhere in Western Europe they could get ammo for it.

[Abbott Shaull]

For an infantry company, its surprising the number of different weapons that you would find in the arms rooms. I've seen everything from M-21s to Remington 870s to M1911A1s (years after the blessed Berretta cursed our Army), M-16A1s (years after they were supposed to be turned in for conversion), M-60s and M240s....even M202s.

NCOs were always being pulled for inspections, and it always seemed that some field-grade officer had signed the paperwork for an exception to TO&E.

LOL. Well in the 1988 we were using old M16A1s for basic training still... Ugh.

[HorseSoldier]

Also how many shotguns would be in Company size unit I mean by t2k these weapons could be used both for hunting purpose and close-quarter fighting. I can even see at Company level or higher having some hunting rifles for the same purpose. So as not to waste military ammo for game hunting.

Depending on the MTOE, probably none in the T2K timeline (though the basis of issue for the HK CAW is an open question).

Real world, in the SF unit I was in we had about a million shotguns on the inventory. No idea who they belonged to on paper (ODAs versus support units, etc.) but in practice three per ODA for ballistic breaching and spares from there. In the current light cavalry unit I'm in we have (I think) eight for the troop authorized, though none on hand since shotguns are being issued above and beyond the authorized MTOE for conventional units down range, again for ballistic breaching.

How many non-authorized side-arms and abundant amount of SMG Would troops who didn't have need or regular be issued side arms and/or Submachine guns would they be allowed to "borrow" them from elsewhere and keep them. Especially troops that Assault Rifles or Battle Rifle that have been in lot of urban built area fighting, might accept the extra weight for peace of mind having something they can handle more readily than their regular weapons. I mean the Machine gunner are issued side-arms for reason of self-defense at close range, but I can see them using them at times while clearing a house for use of outpost later where you don't want to tear it up too badly if you do find previous 'owners' still in residence.

Real world US military -- even white side SOF -- privately owned weapons downrange can be a career killing error, possibly even leading to criminal prosecution. I know some people whose careers in SF were essentially destroyed because they went downrange with personally owned sidearms that were better quality/better weapons than the M9 (well, because they got caught with them, anyway). Even the super cool kids on the black side do not, as far as I know, take stuff they bought themselves anywhere, they just are in units that have latitude to color further outside the lines on acquiring and issuing odd stuff.

T2K -- I think any unit with any motor transport to speak of would be a traveling bazaar of odds and ends, weapons wise. Guys who have to haul everything they own on their backs aren't likely to squirrel away a 9mm sub gun and a couple pistols and an AKSU and a nice 30-06 hunting rifle they happened upon along the way, but if you can chuck that stuff in the back of a truck or an APC it's wide open game on sort of stuff unless the command environment goes out of its way to discourage it.

When operating in built up areas they will carry at least one shotgun per squad, but this is more for breaching hard points i.e. locked doors than for actual fighting, although they can get used for this if necessary and of course as stated, they're good for hunting.

Our shotguns were strictly used for breaching -- set up with pistol grips only, nothing but #9 birdshot or product designed breaching rounds loaded and carried, and shotguns carried on an empty chamber or an expended round still in the chamber at all times except when actively 'gunning a door. (That latter required SOP after a SEAL managed to shoot another SEAL in the clown shoes with a slung shotgun (loaded, safety off) during training -- yet another entry in the highlight reel for the Sleep Eat And Lift boys.)

Shotguns may be in scarce supply. MP's and security units routinely employ the use of shotguns and may issue them as a primary weapon but usually supported by someone else carrying a rifle, carbine or SMG, with both people working/ moving together as a two-man team.

Real world US military the only other people who drew from the Ammo Supply Point I got my bombs and bullets from with shotguns in the inventory were several MP companies. The Sergeant Major who ran the ASP frequently noted (as I was signing for several thousand rounds of #9 birdshot for breaching and 00 buckshot for fighting applications) that he was always amazed that you apparently couldn't pay those MP units to do anything with their issued shotguns at all. Literally most FYs they fired a grand total of zero rounds of shotgun ammo.

Which honestly makes sense -- civilian LE uses shotguns partly because of institutional conservatism and partly for liability concerns (rifle bullets having the external ballistics to accidentally kill someone quite a bit further downrange than shotgun pellets), but are increasingly switching to the M4 or similar patrol carbines. If you've got an M4 you don't really need a shotgun for any LE application (except, here in Alaska, putting down the odd moose or bear).

[perardua]

The Squadron I deployed to Afghanistan with went from having a total of 12 Browning pistols to have 160 Sig P226's (so one per man) as soon as we arrived. The British forces in general have seen a massive increase in the issue of pistols in the last couple of years due to the nature of combat in Afghanistan. We also had the squadron weapons augmented by extra LMGs and UGLs, enabling the sniper section to be equipped as a rifle section in addition to their .338s (oh, the joy of watching one of the snipers lugging around both an LMG and a .338 on a foot patrol!)

As for L85A2s, we had enough for everyone to be assigned a rifle, including the LMG gunners and sneaky sneaky snipers. Of course, when I was at KAF UK forces didn't routinely carry their weapons on camp unless the alert state went up, preferring to leave them in armoury. Even when it did go up for a couple of weeks, most of us just carried our pistols around the place and kept our other weapons in our vehicles, seeing as being on camp meant we were the QRF, and if we were off camp patrolling it was a moot point.

As an aside, every British transport helicopter I have been in has had the crew with rifles as well as their pistols - they all have rifle racks fitted to the pilot and co-pilots seats and for the loadies. I also recall reading that Apache pilots carry L85 carbines in their cockpits.

GPMGs aren't individual weapons, they were generally vehicle mounted and simply dismounted and carried in lieu of a rifle if going on a foot patrol where it was felt the firepower would be needed.