Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are European handguns rubbish?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Are European handguns rubbish?

    Just a quick question from one who has no idea.

    I was reading Debt of Honour (Tom Clancy) and a CIA agent needed a handgun and could only get one from a Russian. It was some low calibre affair (22 or less) which his was not happy with..fair enough. But the charachter makes some statement to his friend in the realms of 'the europeans dont know how to make handguns'. I find this hard to believe and thought - I know some people who will know for sure

  • #2
    Nope!

    Europe has long been home to some of the world's finest firearms designers (and one European company, Beretta, is not only the oldest firearms company, but is the oldest company). I'm afraid that Clancy is a tad "mistaken".
    The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

    Comment


    • #3
      On the subject of European handguns:

      SiG, HK, Browning, FN, Walther, Berretta, Hammerelli... Yep. They don't know handguns...
      Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

      Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.

      Comment


      • #4
        I would hazzard to say that the Europeans make more high quality handguns than anyone else in the world. Panther Al's list says it all (and don't forget Glock).

        Perhaps the character was referring to Russians, specifically. Their handguns are weak, to say the least.
        Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

        https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
        https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
        https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
        https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
        https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

        Comment


        • #5
          He might have been commenting on how difficult it is to purchase a decent handgun illegally in Europe. Many of the under the table arms dealers are Russian and generally sell things like the Baikal, a gas firing pistol converted to 9mmP and coming with a dodgy silencer. By all accounts those aren't great guns.

          It's not totally accurate, however, a mate of mine is a Police Inspector dealing with gun crime in this area. The last arms dealer they arrested was carrying a couple of Kalashnikovs, several re-activated Ingrams, three .357 Colts as well as a selection of 9mm autos. By all accounts the crappy .22s and Saturday Night Specials are entry level shooters with anyone but the sixteen-year old wannabes take whatever they can get.

          All of this is still very dangerous, in the UK you can get shot dead for having a piece of wood in a plastic bag. Just possessing an illegal gun carries a sentence that is longer than murdering someone. Other European countries are similarly draconian.

          That said, you'd expect a CIA agent to have better contacts.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hummm, there is one handgun that does make you wonder just what the designer was thinking....the P9S is a decent little pistol, but the mag release is on the bottom of the grip....little hard to do a rapid mag change!

            I'll stick to my old Colt Mark IV Series 70......
            The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.

            Comment


            • #7
              Brad Thor's first book Lions of Lucerene (sp) has his main character in Swiss Confederation hunting for the kidnappers of the President. And he needed a gun but couldn't buy a real one... so he bought an airsoft pistol of the pistol he really wanted to get... because he felt the appearence of hving a gun was better than not having a gun....
              Fuck being a hero. Do you know what you get for being a hero? Nothing! You get shot at. You get a little pat on the back, blah blah blah, attaboy! You get divorced... Your wife can't remember your last name, your kids don't want to talk to you... You get to eat a lot of meals by yourself. Trust me kid, nobody wants to be that guy. I do this because there is nobody else to do it right now. Believe me if there was somebody else to do it, I would let them do it. There's not, so I'm doing it.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Raellus View Post
                I would hazzard to say that the Europeans make more high quality handguns than anyone else in the world. Panther Al's list says it all (and don't forget Glock).

                Perhaps the character was referring to Russians, specifically. Their handguns are weak, to say the least.
                I am trying very hard to forget Glock... Oh, and add Steyr to the list of great pistols as well.

                Originally posted by dragoon500ly View Post
                Hummm, there is one handgun that does make you wonder just what the designer was thinking....the P9S is a decent little pistol, but the mag release is on the bottom of the grip....little hard to do a rapid mag change!

                I'll stick to my old Colt Mark IV Series 70......
                Mag releases on the bottom of the grip is a very european thing: Goes along with what we consider a pistol is supposed to be used for and what they think:

                For the Americans, Pistols are a combat tool: meant to be used in combat with the goal of killing as many people as fast as possible using a minimum of ammo. Hence, the magnums, the .45's, etc...

                For the Europeans, Pistols are secondly a back up weapon for when the shit has well and truly hit the fan, and primarily as an Officers weapon; a status symbol more than a combat tool. A holdover from when officers came from an official Officer (or Noble- sometimes the same thing) class. Hence, Mag capacities are typically lower, as well as the use of lighter ammo compared to the US. Hence, the .32's, .380's, the 9mm's, etc... They don't want a heavy rugged massive pistol: something nice and light is much easier to tote around if they never plan on using it in the first place.

                Of course, thats just my opinion, and you know what they say about opinions... and to be fair, Europe is coming around to the US point of view on pistols.
                Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

                Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.

                Comment


                • #9
                  There's also the possibility that Clancy was using that statement to illustrate some aspect of the CIA agent's personality/character. That is to say, perhaps the agent was written as being biased against European firearms and just made the sort of statement that you hear often enough about car marques.

                  Like everyone here as mentioned, the Europeans do make some pistols that range from fine to outstanding but as Panther Al specifically stated, it just took the Europeans some time to realize that pistols are more than just status symbols or authority symbols.
                  Other current/former European pistol makers include: -
                  Astra
                  Benelli
                  CZUB (AKA CZ) - The CZ75 in particular
                  Korriphila
                  Korth
                  MAB
                  Mauser - Who hasn't seen the C96 AKA Broomhandle Mauser for example
                  Sphinx
                  Steyr
                  Star
                  Tanfoglio

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Panther Al View Post
                    I am trying very hard to forget Glock... Oh, and add Steyr to the list of great pistols as well.
                    Have you had a bad Glock experience

                    I really like my Glock 19. It's light, easy to maintain, a pleasure to shoot- and it cost hundreds less than an H&K or SigSauer. I wanted a Walther P99, but apparently, they stopped making/selling them in the States a couple of years ago. I'm actually rather pleased that I decided to go Glock. They're so common that both factory and aftermarket parts and accessories are easy to find and relatively innexpensive. It's the gangbangers and nutters that use them that give them a bad rap.
                    Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

                    https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
                    https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
                    https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
                    https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
                    https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Raellus View Post
                      Have you had a bad Glock experience

                      I really like my Glock 19. It's light, easy to maintain, a pleasure to shoot- and it cost hundreds less than an H&K or SigSauer. I wanted a Walther P99, but apparently, they stopped making/selling them in the States a couple of years ago. I'm actually rather pleased that I decided to go Glock. They're so common that both factory and aftermarket parts and accessories are easy to find and relatively innexpensive. It's the gangbangers and nutters that use them that give them a bad rap.
                      I think his response may be due to several instances where either poor training on/understanding of the Glock safety mechanism resulted in unauthorized discharges by people who should have known better or (the more likely of the two I think), where several Glock pistols have been found to be poorly manufactured and resulted in pistols blowing themselves apart in the users hand.
                      I don't recall if the destructing pistols were ones manufactured in Austria or at the Smyrna, Georgia factory in the US.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        In all honesty: Yes, the Glock is a good pistol: I might even go as far to say its an outstanding pistol. But I do have my reasons, but for the most part really are not on point.

                        I'm a huge Steyr fan: I loved my Steyr GB. It is one of the two pistols that first nodded in the direction of combat pistols in that it had a large (18 Rd) magazine capacity (The other was the HK VP70, though for a different reason, also, having owned one of the *fun* versions, I can tell you from personal experience the trigger pull is horrible). It had its issues. Mainly because Steyr screwed up by letting Rogak build them. But once Steyr took over, its star was in the ascendent. As the first hi-cap 9mm, it was destined for greatness, except a year or so later some goofballs came up with this plastic thing called a Glock, and well...

                        Losing the Austrian Army contract - the GB was considered a shoo-in due to capacity, and the fact that it is a very soft shooter - to Glock put the nail in its coffin.

                        Thats one reason, the other is that I had the misfortune to have a Glock fail on me at a very unpleasant and unfortunate moment. Not a dig on the design: even Ferrari makes a lemon every now and then. And lets face it, a full auto glock is just pure fun.

                        The occasions when they was first being purchased by law enforcement and the users shot themselves with unfortunate regularity is a training issue: not fully the fault of the design - mostly. I don't like the trigger at all and how they are taken down. But thats all personal.

                        As to the list, yeash. How did I forget CZ. There is a company that never gets the props it is due.
                        Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

                        Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Panther Al View Post
                          I am trying very hard to forget Glock... Oh, and add Steyr to the list of great pistols as well.



                          Mag releases on the bottom of the grip is a very european thing: Goes along with what we consider a pistol is supposed to be used for and what they think:

                          For the Americans, Pistols are a combat tool: meant to be used in combat with the goal of killing as many people as fast as possible using a minimum of ammo. Hence, the magnums, the .45's, etc...

                          For the Europeans, Pistols are secondly a back up weapon for when the shit has well and truly hit the fan, and primarily as an Officers weapon; a status symbol more than a combat tool. A holdover from when officers came from an official Officer (or Noble- sometimes the same thing) class. Hence, Mag capacities are typically lower, as well as the use of lighter ammo compared to the US. Hence, the .32's, .380's, the 9mm's, etc... They don't want a heavy rugged massive pistol: something nice and light is much easier to tote around if they never plan on using it in the first place.

                          Of course, thats just my opinion, and you know what they say about opinions... and to be fair, Europe is coming around to the US point of view on pistols.
                          Depends on point of view I guess.

                          Up until recently the British army has used the FN Browning, a 9mm weapon that has a 13 round mag. Compare that to theold American 1911 which was a .45 and only carried 7 rounds.

                          Today the british use the SIG 226 which is another 9mm with a 15 round mag. American went with the M9 to replace the 1911 which is a 9mm Berretta 92 with a 15 round mag.

                          Seems to me that America is actualy coming around the the European point of view on handguns, not the other way around.
                          Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Looking at the actual list of pistols made by European countries, it's hard to think of what Clancy is driving at -- Glock, Sig, FN, etc etc etc.

                            I could see expressing dissatisfaction with Russian pistols, specifically -- they're still trying to figure out the concept of a fighting handgun as far as I can tell, but Western Europe got on that bandwagon in the 60s to 80s, depending on firm and specific design.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
                              Depends on point of view I guess.

                              Up until recently the British army has used the FN Browning, a 9mm weapon that has a 13 round mag. Compare that to theold American 1911 which was a .45 and only carried 7 rounds.

                              Today the british use the SIG 226 which is another 9mm with a 15 round mag. American went with the M9 to replace the 1911 which is a 9mm Berretta 92 with a 15 round mag.

                              Seems to me that America is actualy coming around the the European point of view on handguns, not the other way around.
                              Hrm... 50-50 on that. Yes, we went with the 9mm. Not too happy about that, but I do like the mag cap that it allows. I really do think that if the .40 existed, it would have been a good compromise chambering for NATO use. Not a fan of the 9: Decent round, but not really a man stopper. I agree that the .45 is a bit much for a lot of shooters. And the size holds back the mag cap. I don't think it was the right call, we should have stuck with the 45, but... I agree that when you consider all the reasons, going to the 9 was a reasonable choice.

                              Now: If I had to pick a pistol that would be the only one I would ever have, can't trade, sell it, get another of any kind, nor have easy access to parts

                              Browning HP all night long. Even over the 1911. The 45 is hard on parts, over the years it wouldn't hold up as well as the High Power would with its lighter 9mm loads.
                              Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

                              Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X