Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Composition of TF34

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Composition of TF34

    I've been thinking about TF34 and what the compliment of ships would be. Clearly "anything that can float and make it back and forth across a late autumn Atlantic Ocean" would be a qualifier, but just for fun I looked at what military vessels might be pressed in to service.

    This might dovetail into my "Proceedings for December 2000" I may write one of these days, but for now, bear with me.

    First of all, we have the USS John Hancock, DD981. Assuming she made it this far into the war by dint of able crew and captain and not that she was laid up somewhere due to massive damage, then pressed into service in the last for TF34/OpOrd Omega, she ships with 19 officers and 315 crew. The fighting spaces on a ship are tight, so I doubt if any personnel who responded to OpOrd Omega will be on board, save for possibly newborn infants in the sickbay and high-ranking officers.

    The weapon compliment for the ship is as follows:

    2 x 5 in (127 mm) 54 calibre Mark 45 dual purpose guns
    2 x 20 mm Phalanx CIWS Mark 15 guns
    1 x 8 cell ASROC launcher (removed)
    1 x 8 cell NATO Sea Sparrow Mark 29 missile launcher
    2 x quadruple Harpoon missile canisters
    2 x Mark 32 triple 12.75 in (324 mm) torpedo tubes (Mk 46 torpedoes)
    1 x 61 cell Mk 41 VLS launcher for Tomahawk missiles

    The Tomahawk cells may be empty at this stage in the war; hell all of the missile tubes may be empty. But I can't imagine they'd be out of 5in or 20mm.

    I thought about what the Navy might be scraping the barrel to put afloat in 2000, and cast my thought back to WWII (or younger) reserve (non-fighting) ships. Crater-class Liberty ships still existed in the 1980s (indeed a few still exist today, in addition to two held in pristine condition as museums but we're Twilight:2000's alternate future!). Most were struck and scrapped from 1964-1974, but some (below) were returned to the Maritime Shipping Commission


    Cassiopeia
    Celeno
    Phobos
    Draco
    Mintaka
    Murzim
    Caelum
    Giansar
    Alderamin
    Appanoose


    Each of these can carry approximately 500 troops "and vehicles", so if you delete the vehicles perhaps 1000 or so troops could be carried...

    Anyway, their armament was as follows:

    1 -- 5"/38 caliber gun
    1 -- 3"/50 caliber gun
    2 -- 40 mm guns
    6 -- 20 mm guns

    and while in storage I doubt if the guns remained on, at least a few would be refitted.

    However, these ships are problematic: if they are still in operable condition and wouldn't require more refitting than is feasible in a practical manner, given that using the bunker oil TF34 intends to for its trip home, the USN may want to keep them to form the backbone of a rebuilding Navy, moving relief supplies and evacuating people where the ships can reach.

    Also, the ships may have been kept in storage in San Diego which I believe is a smoking crater at this time.

    If they were dispersed to various shipyards, there's the question of getting them around the horn (I'm assuming the Canal got hit very hard and is unusable these days) if some were on the west coast. Possibly some were at the Navy shipyard in Jersey, but that's gone.

    Ultimately I think most of the shipping is going to consist of cargo ships of various stripe that were already in Bremerhaven; I doubt the Mercedes-Benz company is going to be in any position to protest when a shitload of 1998 "S" series coupes and sedans are tossed overboard to make room for the valiant American allies.
    THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.

  • #2
    Something to bear in mind is that ONLY ships located in Europe will be a part of the task force. There's no way to get ships with empty fuel tanks from the US and back again, given the oil is located (presumably) somewhere around Bremerhaven.

    We know USS John Hancock was the flagship of the operation, and so we can presume it would have a fairly full complement of crew (drawn from survivors of other ships to round it out as necessary). Weapons, ammunition and general repair level might not be up to prewar scratch, but as one of the few fighting ships still floating, chances are it's going to have received a substantial share of available naval resources (mostly salvaged from other more heavily damaged ships).

    We also know the USS Tarawa was at least floating in Summer 2000 (Naval & Aviation handbook - the notes from the colour plate showing the Osprey). Given the Tarawa is a far more capable C3 ship than the John Hancock, it's not much of a leap to believe it's either immobilised from actions during the Marine landings in July, or (my personal belief) sunk of the Polish coast.

    From the Last Submarine trilogy, we also know there's no submarines in the task force. Also, given the USS John Hancock is the flagship, it's logical that no larger warships are included. My guess is the bulk of the task force consists of civilian freighters and passenger ships (cruise liners, ferries). As a point of interest, the RMS Queen Mary was refitted for WWII and carried up to 15,000 troops at a time (holds the record of 16,082). It's peacetime capacity was 2139 passengers and 1101 crew.
    Provided a similar size ship was available, it's conceivable only about a dozen ships (although more likely about 20) would be needed to transport the 40,000 members of TF34.
    If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

    Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

    Mors ante pudorem

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
      Something to bear in mind is that ONLY ships located in Europe will be a part of the task force. There's no way to get ships with empty fuel tanks from the US and back again, given the oil is located (presumably) somewhere around Bremerhaven.
      Mm. That leaves out any of those ships then.


      We know USS John Hancock was the flagship of the operation, and so we can presume it would have a fairly full complement of crew (drawn from survivors of other ships to round it out as necessary). Weapons, ammunition and general repair level might not be up to prewar scratch, but as one of the few fighting ships still floating, chances are it's going to have received a substantial share of available naval resources (mostly salvaged from other more heavily damaged ships).

      We also know the USS Tarawa was at least floating in Summer 2000 (Naval & Aviation handbook - the notes from the colour plate showing the Osprey). Given the Tarawa is a far more capable C3 ship than the John Hancock, it's not much of a leap to believe it's either immobilised from actions during the Marine landings in July, or (my personal belief) sunk of the Polish coast.

      From the Last Submarine trilogy, we also know there's no submarines in the task force. Also, given the USS John Hancock is the flagship, it's logical that no larger warships are included. My guess is the bulk of the task force consists of civilian freighters and passenger ships (cruise liners, ferries). As a point of interest, the RMS Queen Mary was refitted for WWII and carried up to 15,000 troops at a time (holds the record of 16,082). It's peacetime capacity was 2139 passengers and 1101 crew.
      Provided a similar size ship was available, it's conceivable only about a dozen ships (although more likely about 20) would be needed to transport the 40,000 members of TF34.
      While I don't want to open up the debate again about Tarawa being sunk (which sadly seems most likely, beached is the only other possibility), could it be that the Tarawa has gone into own cantonment, like units that refused the OpOrd Omega in the first place and become a 39000 ton high tech pirate ship
      Last edited by raketenjagdpanzer; 01-15-2012, 05:29 PM.
      THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.

      Comment


      • #4
        Extremely doubtful. Floating, the Tarawa is just too damn valuable to leave out of formal military hands. All sides would want to lay claim to it and you can guarantee a SF raid or two would be on the cards.
        Look at the USS City of Corpus Christi and the efforts made to recover it - and it doesn't have a fraction of the capability of an amphious landing ship (even if it is nuclear powered).
        If the Tarawa couldn't be reclaimed for TF34, there's a high probability in my mind it would have been sunk. It would even warrant using one of the few remaining aircraft to throw the last couple of missiles at it.
        If Nato didn't finish it off, you can bet the Pact would give it a good go - having what is a essentially a light aircraft carrier/military base located just off the Vistula delta would be a totally unacceptable prospect, even if immobile. Sure it only operates VTOL and STOL aircraft, and fuel is low, but just the capability alone is a scary prospect for the Pact leadership, especially since they can't exactly attack and overrun it with tanks and infantry like a conventional airstrip.
        If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

        Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

        Mors ante pudorem

        Comment


        • #5
          Other than the Hancock, I'm not aware of any other vessel, Naval or civilian, being specifically identified as part of TF34. Personally, I'd be inclined to go along with the views already put forward, i.e. that the bulk of the fleet would be civilian vessels.

          I think its almost analagous to Battlestar Galactica (or at least the original film from the 70's - I never saw the remake / reboot so don't know if it differs)...you have a lone warship escorting a ragtag civilian fleet to its destination...here the John Hancock is the Galactica.

          And who knows, maybe there's a Pegasus out there somewhere...
          Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by raketenjagdpanzer View Post
            I thought about what the Navy might be scraping the barrel to put afloat in 2000, and cast my thought back to WWII (or younger) reserve (non-fighting) ships. Crater-class Liberty ships still existed in the 1980s (indeed a few still exist today, in addition to two held in pristine condition as museums but we're Twilight:2000's alternate future!). Most were struck and scrapped from 1964-1974, but some (below) were returned to the Maritime Shipping Commission


            Cassiopeia
            Celeno
            Phobos
            Draco
            Mintaka
            Murzim
            Caelum
            Giansar
            Alderamin
            Appanoose

            I checked on the Crater-class Cargo Ship using NavSource Online (http://www.navsource.org/) and I found all of the ships listed were scrapped, and I also found that out of the 63 Crater-class ships built, none would in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, because they are all scraped or destroyed. However there would be still a number of Liberty and Victory Ships available, here is a list:

            Liberty ship
            SS Arthur M Huddel
            SS John W. Brown
            SS Jeremiah O'Brien

            Victory ship
            SS American Victory (Tampa, Florida)
            SS Lane Victory (Los Angeles, California)
            SS Red Oak Victory (Richmond, California)
            SS Earlham Victory (Brownsville, Texas)
            SS Pan American Victory (Brownsville, Texas)
            SS Rider Victory (Brownsville, Texas)
            SS Winthrop Victory (Brownsville, Texas)
            "You're damn right, I'm gonna be pissed off! I bought that pig at Pink Floyd's yard sale!"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Rainbow Six View Post
              I think its almost analagous to Battlestar Galactica (or at least the original film from the 70's - I never saw the remake / reboot so don't know if it differs)...
              The remake is actually pretty good in the first couple of seasons at least. You really get the feeling of desperation from the survivors and the shoelaces and chewing gum holding everything together shows through nicely too.
              If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

              Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

              Mors ante pudorem

              Comment


              • #8
                I think any craft that would foat and make the trip could go, like the durring the evac at Dunkirk, there about 65 major seaports on the eastern US alone plenty of places to find ships and fuel, I mean the Soviets could'nt nuke them all, heck it sounds like good adventure

                Twilight 2000 V2 did a adventure along theses line in Bangkok Cesspool of the Orient in which character are trying to get rid out a group on pirates living in an old LST
                I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier.

                Comment


                • #9
                  So if there's all these ships over on the US east coast and there's all this fuel just laying about, why isn't it being used already
                  As previously stated, common sense dictates that only ships in the Baltic/North Sea region would have been available for the evacuation, and even then, bringing some of them in would have been a major undertaking - laid up for the last couple of years without fuel, maintenance, or crew.

                  The vast majority of shipping used post 1997 would be either wind powered, or small and relatively efficient fuel burners in comparison to larger vessels capable of an Atlantic crossing. Maintenance on these larger vessels would have been virtually non-existant - why would you bother if the crews are better used on smaller fishing boats or coastal cargo haulers. These large and essentially useless vessels simply don't warrant any expenditure of valuable and scarce resources to keep them seaworthy.

                  My guess is the larger ships would be tied up to the dock where their fuel ran out, or towed out of the way and anchored. With storms, nukes, stray torpedoes, mines and all the other dangers, it isn't likely many would be left in sailing condition.
                  If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

                  Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

                  Mors ante pudorem

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
                    So if there's all these ships over on the US east coast and there's all this fuel just laying about, why isn't it being used already
                    A couple of months back I posted the list of USN ships operating between Norfolk and NYC during the early months of 2001, immediately following the arrival at Norfolk of TF34, as published in the GDW mini-module A Rock in Troubled Waters. It doesn't specifically state which of those vessels was already stationed on the US east coast and which arrived with TF34. Therefore, at the discretion of each individual GM, any or all of those vessels (although obviously only the ones capable of a trans-Atlantic crossing) may have been part of TF34.
                    sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
                      The remake is actually pretty good in the first couple of seasons at least. You really get the feeling of desperation from the survivors and the shoelaces and chewing gum holding everything together shows through nicely too.
                      It gets more profound as the series winds down; mid series (seasons #2 and #3) things are practically going well for the refugees.
                      THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Legbreaker View Post
                        So if there's all these ships over on the US east coast and there's all this fuel just laying about, why isn't it being used already
                        I didn't say there was; I was putting it out there as a possibility. Also, the fuel for a crossing might be held as strategic reserve for just such an eventuality, or a final ReForGer, or something along those lines.

                        However, as was pointed out, the shipping came from German ports anyway, so it's a non-issue.
                        THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Here is the link to my previous post listing the USN assets detailed in A Rock in Troubled Waters:

                          Raketenjagdpanzer, there are some other excellent posts in that thread by other members here which may also be of value to your TF34 musings.
                          Last edited by Targan; 01-19-2012, 12:38 AM.
                          sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by raketenjagdpanzer View Post
                            I didn't say there was; I was putting it out there as a possibility. Also, the fuel for a crossing might be held as strategic reserve for just such an eventuality, or a final ReForGer, or something along those lines.

                            However, as was pointed out, the shipping came from German ports anyway, so it's a non-issue.
                            I'm going from memory here, but didn't reinforcements of sorts (mainly USAR Light Divisions) sail from the US to Europe in either late 1998 or sometime in 1999 - Civgov to Yugoslavia and Milgov to Germany

                            If that's the case then not impossible that there was only enough fuel available at the time for these ships to only make a one way journey and some of them could now return to the US as part of TF34

                            Just a thought...
                            Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Something else to keep in mind is just because ships are available, doesn't mean they'll be allowed to be used by their owners. What about all the other nations involved and how are they going to feel about the US grabbing every last bathtub able to float across the Atlantic Image how Britain for example would react to seeing "their" ships being rounded up by the remnants of the US navy and sailing off into the sunset!
                              If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

                              Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

                              Mors ante pudorem

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X