Could you rip out the passenger seats of those aircraft and outfit them with standard troop seats and stretcher stands What level of modification would this take if it is possible Might be able to put more people and gear in the same space, though it wouldn't help the problem with weight and fuel expenditure...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Turkey & Nuclear Weapons
Collapse
X
-
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes
Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
-
I don't know about putting in military style seating, but you can reconfigure a passenger jet to increase its capacity, for example by stripping out the First Class and Business Class seats, which have a bigger seat pitch, to put in more economy seats. I'm no expert on the subject, but the seats basically get fitted into rails on the floor and can be removed / amended as neccessary- I don't think it's a major operation. iirc Sanjuro works in the airline industry so might be able to go into more detail.
The record for maximum number of passengers on a single flight belongs to an El Al Israeli Airlines 747.
It's interesting to note they planned for 760 passengers, so that may be approaching maximm capacity, although Addis - Tel Aviv would presumably require much less fuel than a transatlantic flight, so would consequently be able to carry more passengers.
Personally, I think there would be enough wide bodied 747's, 767's and 777's (which were just entering service) and equivalent Airbus types (I'm not sure if US carriers are big users of Airbus' wide bodies) available to meet Government needs (and probably still leave the airlines with enough to maintain remaining international services), so there would be no need to go as far as requisitioning 737's (or even 757's).Last edited by Rainbow Six; 11-04-2012, 01:59 PM.Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom
Comment
-
Just posting my two cents in regards to gasoline hoarding and rationing.
Having witnessed it myself, I think we can pretty well agree that gasoline, or any sort of fuel hoarding would be rampant once word reaches of a pending apocalypse. In the case of T2K, it was a rather popular idea during the Cold War that once the U.S. and U.S.S.R. literally began locking horns in Europe and elsewhere, the situation would quickly deteriorate and go nuclear. Lines at gas stations would increase drastically with panic buying and the stations would get jammed, fights would break out (with some likely turning bloody) and police and perhaps even National Guard in a few cases would take control of the gas stations, with forced rationing put into effect. There may be more cases of looters attempting to siphon gas from any sort of parked vehicles including construction equipment to fill their own spare tanks as well.
This would also just as well apply to any other basic necessities. Food and drinking water would get hoarded as any sort of grocery or supermarket gets their shelves cleaned by panic buyers and/or opportunists and looters. I'd also expect runs on other things such as batteries, candles, portable radios, hygienic supplies, etc. Oh yes, the gun stores will be making a killing too, assuming they don't get robbed or looted as well.
After that...well, once things go completely south and the nukes fly Anyone who's got a decent cache of supplies will, sadly, have to realize there's plenty others out there who would rather take those supplies for themselves, one way or another..."The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
— David Drake
Comment
-
I think we can point to natural events such as Sandy to see a small sample of what would happen. In T2K with the tension continuing for months (not just the days prior to a big storm) the situation could probably be MUCH worse. Logistics networks may even break under the strain, especially when the desperate mobs start hijacking the trucks before they even reach the warehouses.If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.
Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"
Mors ante pudorem
Comment
-
Originally posted by Legbreaker View PostI think we can point to natural events such as Sandy to see a small sample of what would happen. In T2K with the tension continuing for months (not just the days prior to a big storm) the situation could probably be MUCH worse. Logistics networks may even break under the strain, especially when the desperate mobs start hijacking the trucks before they even reach the warehouses.
Though admittedly, this is being seen mostly from a POV of what might/would have occurred on the American home front, I'd be curious as to how bad, if not worse it would be playing out on the other home fronts such as Australia, the U.K., France, etc."The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
— David Drake
Comment
Comment