Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2000 vs. 2013 vs. 2020 vs. 20??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2000 vs. 2013 vs. 2020 vs. 20??

    It's pretty obvious from reading this forum that the setting history of the Twilight: 2000 games you're playing now has been tweaked to fit your group and style. What about the actual year of the game I'm curious to know if more people are playing a near-future version of Twilight or if they are playing a year 2000 game. I think there's good reasons for both, but I'd like to get a better understanding of why people choose to run games set in either period.

    Forgive me if this has already been covered in another thread - I'm still pretty new here.

  • #2
    I'm sure a post-Soviet world a mere five years after the publication of Twilight:2000 would have seemed completely bonkers to the folks at GDW (and indeed 99.9% of the world's population at the time), however, I find the timeline(s) of T2k13 a little too far-fetched for my tastes.

    Plus there's a lot of "the now" to factor in to how the world of T2k13 works...it's easier for me to look back on T2k as a divergent history (it could have happened) than T2k13 as "this could happen"...

    That's just my feeling on it. All have their merits, though. T2k13, strictly from a "gun porn" standpoint has it's armored vehicles more anchored in reality - no M1 "Giraffe", no "Diana ADA" and on and on. The T:2k designs represent a mindset of the cold war continuing on through the 80s and 90s before going hot in '96...so stuff like the TUSK for M1, even the Stryker, Humvee variants and so on would likely have been suggested and rejected prior to the war in the T2k universe.
    THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.

    Comment


    • #3
      Agreed with the above post. I can't see how a world would make sense. Its more an "alternate" reality based game now, as opposed to a future one. I suppose one could create a new "alternate" reality with a soviet resurgence and WWIII.

      I belive that the would of Merc2000 makes more sense to your line of thinking. That concept, a world defined by an economic collapse, could easily fit our possible future.

      Comment


      • #4
        2000

        I prefer the alternative history/parallel universe of Twilight 2000. I got the v1.0 boxed set in 1986, when I was eleven or twelve years old. At the time, it seemed that WWIII could be just around the corner...

        So, my T2KU is a bit of an extension of my childhood worldview- a universe in which the Berlin Wall did not fall and the Soviet Union did not collapse. The Cold War continued into the '90s, heated up, and boiled over. Really, I guess, it's a worst-case scenario from 1987 or so preserved in amber, with some "new" military technologies thrown in. It seemed very plausible when I was a kid, and that's the world I prefer to inhabit now, as an adult.

        I wouldn't mind a game set in the near future (relative to today), but the lead-in would have to be plausible, the same way the original T2K was when it was first released.
        Last edited by Raellus; 11-07-2012, 05:51 PM.
        Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

        https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
        https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
        https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
        https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
        https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

        Comment


        • #5
          Assuming one needs a timeline in the first place, and I assert that one does not, of the canon timelines I prefer good old v1. I never acknowledged the need to update it to account for then-current events for 2.0/2.2 but it doesn't really make that much difference to the end state in which the characters begin play. The 2013 timeline chapped a lot of asses around here and elesewhere, but I can take it or leave it for the same reason noted above - it mostly doesn't matter in the context of gameplay. At least not in any tactical context. Anything beyond the immediate battlefield is simply going to require some suspension of disbelief.

          That said, I'm not currently running anything. But if I was, I prefer the Reflex mechanics of 2013, and would use them with only the slightest of modification for any timeline of the series and/or any of the alternate scenarios outlined in the GPS Survey. I figure it should work for anything set in the modern era out to the next 10 or so years of weapons development without too much effort.


          Comment


          • #6
            After 3 months of looking I finally found my Hardcovered copy of TWL2013 (Yes I was one of those whom actually bought the book) and think the timeline was it's weak point and the book layout too spread out to find anything easily, but its reflex system did work well for any situation.
            *************************************
            Each day I encounter stupid people I keep wondering... is today when I get my first assault charge??

            Comment


            • #7
              T2K is my preference for most of the reasons above. To me there's not enough significant differences to play between V1 and V2.x to worry about - the end result is the same and PCs probably don't really care by then that Germany did/did not reunify (for example) prior to the outbreak of European hostilities.
              Alternate timeline is for me the best way to look at it - crystal ball gazing into the future at this point in the Twilight story is too fraught with potential/probable hiccups.
              If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

              Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

              Mors ante pudorem

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Cdnwolf View Post
                After 3 months of looking I finally found my Hardcovered copy of TWL2013 (Yes I was one of those whom actually bought the book) and think the timeline was it's weak point and the book layout too spread out to find anything easily, but its reflex system did work well for any situation.
                I own a hardcover copy of TW2013 too and I agree with your assessment, Cdnwolf.
                sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

                Comment


                • #9
                  Have the book and PDF of Twilight 2013

                  Hey guys,

                  I must say that I really thought the game mechanic is pretty crunchy with all the combat rules that you can throw in. Reminds me of an old FGU game called Space Opera that I ran for 25 years. Lots of charts and stuff. 2013 has a lot of rules but you can kick out what you don't like. I like the fact that the guy who made the book. Basically it was one guy, really tried to support the product but the book just did not sell in large enough numbers and he did not retain the rights to the name.
                  But if you live in Northern California and are free next weekend I am running a Twilight 2013 game at a Con called DunDraCon in San Ramon California. I hope to run games here and there at local cons. Also would like to discuss what rules you like, don't like, would and would not use in your Twilight 2013 game.
                  Also I see that the Morrow Project another old post apolcalyptic game has been funded by Kick Starter.

                  Saulster

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Welcome to the forum, Saulster!

                    Originally posted by Saulster View Post
                    I like the fact that the guy who made the book. Basically it was one guy, really tried to support the product but the book just did not sell in large enough numbers and he did not retain the rights to the name.
                    That's not quite accurate. It's true that the team that wrote Twilight:2013 was a small group of people but it wasn't just one guy. In fact, one of the "other guys" who wrote important parts of the rules, Tegyrius, is a regular poster on this forum and is definitely the "go-to" guy for information on the system.
                    sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Saulster View Post
                      Hey guys,


                      Also I see that the Morrow Project another old post apolcalyptic game has been funded by Kick Starter.

                      Saulster
                      Oh great another game to add to my library.
                      *************************************
                      Each day I encounter stupid people I keep wondering... is today when I get my first assault charge??

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Whilst I'm not playing the game at the moment, everything I write is set in the year 2000 and is based on the V1 timeline - like Raellus I have a nostalgia for the classic Cold War timeline (although ironically v1 is the only version of the game that I don't own - I have soft copies of both versions of V2 and 2013 that I got from Drivethru RPG. To be fair, I got the 2013 pdf more out of curiosity than any likliehood that I would ever use it).
                        Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Targan View Post
                          That's not quite accurate. It's true that the team that wrote Twilight:2013 was a small group of people but it wasn't just one guy. In fact, one of the "other guys" who wrote important parts of the rules, Tegyrius, is a regular poster on this forum and is definitely the "go-to" guy for information on the system.
                          Several of the other contributors are here too. They just aren't as mouthy as I am.

                          - C.
                          Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996

                          Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog.

                          It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
                          - Josh Olson

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I'm not interested in running a PBP, but I would be interested in a 2013 timeline with v2.2 rules.
                            I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

                            Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'm a big fan of the Twilight:2013 reflex rules. I'm planning on running a short (2-3 session) 'campaign' here before summer I hope, I'll be using the reflex system from 2013 with the basic flavor of background from Twilight:2000 - just pushing it ahead in time 13 years with some handwaving

                              For anyone that cares, the hardcover of 2013 is on Amazon right now for $6. I just bought two more for the players (to add to the two I already had )

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X