Malaysian Airlines was flying the route because it is the shortest, and therefore the cheapest. Maybe they shouldn't be flying over the Ukraine or any war zone, but if you put pins on a map of all the "war zones" how much safe flying space is left, and what kind of weird flight paths would be necessary to get from A to B
I read (so take with a grain of salt) that airlines only fuel up enough to get to their destination (with small margin of error) to encourage pilots to do everything they can to save petrol.
Adding countermeasures would add cost, so airlines won't do that.
"Separatists looting the crash site" could mean a few different things in the real world. Is it locals stealing money from wallets (not a nice thought, but given how poor the villagers are it might be a once in a life time opportunity for a few dollars) Is it people taking metal Bodies (trophies, ransoms)
"Separatists looting the crash site" could mean a few different things in the real world. Is it locals stealing money from wallets (not a nice thought, but given how poor the villagers are it might be a once in a life time opportunity for a few dollars) Is it people taking metal Bodies (trophies, ransoms)
Credit cards. That area is very well known for credit card fraud. Plus possibilities of recovering data from peoples various electronic devices which would lead to more fraud.
Credit cards. That area is very well known for credit card fraud. Plus possibilities of recovering data from peoples various electronic devices which would lead to more fraud.
There's a YT video of them going through some guy's luggage; they jack his binocs but throw them back because they're broken.
Looting and what appears to be destroying evidence. Not that there is all that much evidence to begin with. Its pretty cut and dried a missile hit the plane. But what they are probably looking for is missile fragments with serial codes. The looting is a added bonus to the militants.
They. Are. UKRAINIANS! (Or from people's Republic of Donetsk as they call the area they now control)
If some Canadian guy steals a wallet do you start complaining about "those God damn yankees" then
...I know that the separatists are backed up and armed by Russia but they are still mainly Ukrainians. It was Crimea where they got Russian passports and the area was annexed wether the locals wanted or not. Donetsk is trying to become a separate country.
(And the looting seems to be acts of individuals rather than organised and approved by the militia.)
Yes, I'm entirely certain there are no Spetznaz on the ground directing this. Yessir, not a one.
Oh, are you saying that the looters are Spetznaz or just that there are Spetznaz in Ukraine
There were certainly Spetznaz at Crimea. That can be proven quite easily as the "volunteer troops who bought their weapons and gear from shops" had brand new 5.45mm Kalashnikovs with underslung grenade launcher that aren't for sale to civilians and there even were units which all had 2000 optics on their guns. Not to mention that at least on one occasion Ukrainian troops captured "volunteer militia" members who were carrying their Russian military ID. ...Oops.
At Donetsk If you have seen proof of Spetznaz then I am sure that several news agencies would be interested in seeing that. The separatists are mainly using gear that is either looted from Ukrainian military stores or the Russians were just smarter this time and issued older gear. The BUKs I think are the first military equipment that could be proven to have come from Russians. (And now there are already stories claiming that BUKs were seen being moved out of Donetsk and into Russia after downing the airplane.)
I have no doubts that Russians are backing up the separatists and many of the leaders, including the Igor Girkin / Igor Strelkov a former() FSB agent who first took credit for shooting the Malaysian plane, are Russians.
BUT most of the separatists seem to be Ukrainians even if they are pro-Russian Ukrainians. If there are Russian "advisors" or troops on the ground they are keeping a really low profile this time.
The one person I happen to know from the Donetsk region absolutely considers herself to be Russian and not Ukrainian. She is my friend's stepmother and you would not believe the amount of ridiculous propaganda that she gets from her former neighbors that I have to counter to my friend. Stories of the Kiev government moving Jews into camps, Ukrainians performing blood sacrifices of children, etc.
Yes it is a single data point, but some in the area very much consider themselves Russian, and I would assume those with that identification would certainly be more supportive of the separatists.
MSN is reporting that the Seperatists are using cranes to disturb/salvage/loot the crash site.
I'm a bit baffled that there are not airmobile or mechanized Ukrainian Army formations that cannot be sent to secure the site.
The pics of these thugs standing around and menacing the investigators was not shocking in that it was happening, but shocking in its audacity and scope. It seems to be a sharp stick in the eye of the international community and a raised middle finger for good measure.
The area in question isn't even near being under Ukrainian control and would take a dedicated effort and troops pulled from elsewhere to secure it. The Ukrainians are willing to benefit from the propaganda value of this, but that is as far as they can or are willing to go.
I dont agree with appeasing Russia for one big reason - its never worked in the past. With anyone. In fact appeasement has usually led to wars breaking out because of mis-calculations that the other side was too weak and that they wouldnt reply this time because they didnt all the other times.
Remember Hilter kicked off Big Mistake Number Two for the Germans on the assumption that he had gotten away with it by remilitarizing the Rhineland and the Saar, built submarines and battleships in defiance of the Versailles Treaty, taken over Czechoslovakia and Austria - so why should anyone mind if he settles accounts with Poland
Oh, good. I'm not the only one who has noticed that Putin seems to be using Hitler's 1938 Playbook. It amused me in a horrifying way when Putin was accusing the Ukraine government of being Nazis, when his Russian government was the one most emulating the Nazis in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
And Russia has nuclear weapons - but frankly I dont think even Putin is stupid enough to actually do something that he knows will end with his homeland a radioactive wasteland in the cause of defending the right of his boyos to shoot down unarmed airliners.
<snip>
And its time we grew a set and actually had the guts to stand up to Putin because frankly if the British and French had done that in 1936 or 1938 we may not have had Europe look like a moonscape by 1945.
Or are we saying that any country that has atomic weapons can act like barbarians and we will let them get away with it
Two points.
In September 1938, at the time of the Sudentenland Crisis, Chamberlain met with the heads of the British military and asked if they were ready to fight a war with Germany. They told him no, they weren't, that they needed more time. With that knowledge, he went to Munich and appeased Germany. However, also in September 1938, the British military started calling up and training their army and RAF reserves, and factories started running around the clock.
You always have the question with nuclear weapons how far you can push someone before they strike back. Could we threaten Putin with losing Moscow or Volgograd Yes. Can he offer to trade it for Chicago or LA or Miami Yes. Hmmm.
The shooting down of the Malaysia Air liner certainly ups the ante in eastern Ukraine. Is the United States (or France, Britain, German or the Netherlands) ready to send boots on the ground I don't think so yet.
Olefin, what do you suggest we do And please be more specific than "stand up to Putin". Would you be willing to spark a war with Russia to resolve the situation in East Ukraine
Answer: Yes i would be willing threaten to spark a war with Russia if possible to stop a much bigger war later on.
Our allies and friends have to know that the US will be willing to stand up for them as we said we would. Thats why Hitler got away with what he did - because in the end the French and British were paper tigers and let him build up and conquer to where he couldnt be stopped short of a general war.
And consider the fact that the Russians havent been brainwashed completely into a cult following like the North Koreans have - given the US standing up and saying enough is enough and be willign to back it up I highly doubt that the Russians will jump into a war to defend the right to shoot down civilian airliners because Putin's ego would be bruised otherwise.
For all his bluster and BS he isnt Stalin and the Russian military knows damn well what would happen if they went to war with the US. I dont see them ready to committ suicide for Donetsk.
We signed an agreement with the Ukraine where they gave up their nukes in exchange for promises from the US to prevent exactly what is going on with the Russians now. And I doubt the MRE's we have delivered have done much in the way of honoring that agreement
Oh and there are lots of ways the US could make Putin's life a living hell short of war - like arming the Ukranians, training their troops, all out economic warfare with the Russians, moving US forces into Poland and the Baltics and Slovakia that are bigger than the speed bump battalions that are there now, putting the missile shield into Poland and Czech Republic, stationing Aegis ships in the Baltic and Black Sea permanently, etc..
Comment