Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FLAGS,SYMBOLS,PATCHES,MARKINGS of the 2nd American Civil war and related conflicts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Graebarde
    WTF did the US-communist flag come from Sounds like a target got missed somewhere! As for factional flags, the Milgov and Civgov BOTH would fly the stars and stripes. Are we talking something else here The stars and bars (confederate battle flag) would be local use, non official at all. State flags, ie the Lone Star would be common amoung Texas units I think. And Bonnie Blue is NOT a good choice for NA IMO. Flags are symbols and the reuse of them by others is a bit touchy sometimes.
    The US-communist flag was off-topic and found on the web. As a result, it doesn't reflect any personnal opinion but seemed interesting for game purpose (may be I had not made myself clear). For Milgov and Civgov I disagree with your idea but what I put on is only a proposal. It seemed to me that it was interesting for both to fly a flag that would be inspired by it.

    The confederate flag, however, is not the battle flag but the National State Flag that was used during the last month of the war. This was only a reference to an old post coming from the RPGhost. The author of this post had put forward a Confederate Sovereign State that was interesting.

    From what I recall, several states had declared independence and; therefore, would fly their own flag.

    In addition, I would imagine each faction flying their own flag in addition to the star and stripes.

    I agree for the Bonnie Blue but I couldn't imagine anything else and I'm still waiting for proposals from our American community. By the way it had been raised several time as a sign of independence (1810: Republic of West Florida, 1836: inspiration to first Texas flag, 1860-61: Jackson (Mississippi). This is the kind of statement made by NA and their main group is located in Florida and in the South. As a result, it could be one of their choice; a provocative one, I agree but why not From what I understand from the game NA is not exactly a group of US patriots fighting for the revival of the USA.

    By the way, Grae, I'm not sure about the meaning of your last sentence. This is a game and this is game subject only. If you are getting touchy even on that, I'm not sure to see the point of keeping that community togethere. This time I'm the one complaining, but people getting touchy on everything and anything start to be a itching my back a little too much around here. Give us a break!!

    Ok I have done my part but most of these post have nothing to do with personnal, cultural or national attacks. Actually, I don't even think that anyone ever made such attack.
    Last edited by Mohoender; 02-11-2009, 10:02 AM.

    Comment


    • #17
      My understanding is that both Civgov and Milgov see themselves as the rightful, legal and only real government of the USA. Therefore, any move away from even symbols of that would be avoided at all costs.

      Without the symbols and trappings of the prewar government they are little more than yet another bunch of upstarts trying to forge their own empire. While they use the flag, have the constitution in their posession, declaration of independance, and/or dozens of other items and locations of historical and political significance, they will be viewed by many as legitimate.

      The moment they mess with that, they become clowns.
      If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

      Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

      Mors ante pudorem

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Legbreaker
        My understanding is that both Civgov and Milgov see themselves as the rightful, legal and only real government of the USA. Therefore, any move away from even symbols of that would be avoided at all costs.

        Without the symbols and trappings of the prewar government they are little more than yet another bunch of upstarts trying to forge their own empire. While they use the flag, have the constitution in their posession, declaration of independance, and/or dozens of other items and locations of historical and political significance, they will be viewed by many as legitimate.

        The moment they mess with that, they become clowns.
        Actually they are clowns but that is not anything like real life. Actually the flag proposed are not really going away from the stars and stripes but they need some way to differenciate themselves.

        Then IMO, Civgov and Milgov are the weakest point on the American part of the game. I like them because they are very usefull in game terms but, from what I know and understand of Americans they would be both rejected by the population (IRL). In case of something like an armageddon that would wipe out a large part of the American population, the survivors would refound the USA (much like in the Day After or Supervolcano). Beside being overly touchy Americans have some very strong qualities: among them they stick behind their country. They might reject their governement but they will never do that for the country (except may be in favor of their own state). But even in that case, I expect this to last only as long as needed. I would imagine an independent Utah flying its state flag with the nation's flag on the side. Actually, I would imagine Civgov and Milgov to do the same with their falg on one side and the stars and stripes on the other side (or may be side by side).

        Again, this is game material and if both Civgov and Milgov do come to existence they will have a way to differenciate themselves. In that case making a slightly different flag seemed a good option. If you have any other proposal I'll be happy to know. HQ asked an interesting question or so I think.

        Comment


        • #19
          FLAGS AND SYMBOLS 2nd AMERICAN CIVIL WAR

          In my campaign the MilGov /CivGov part is home grown .

          Both use the American flag ,sometimes there are variations such as fewer stars ,stars in a circle or some such as tides ebb and flow in the various captitals and directives come and go .


          I think I had distinctions along the lines of some use of different uniforms ( woodland/desert /od but this was a mix also with no clear guidelines to go by .


          Both organizations claim to be the Federal goverment ,both operate a sham 2 house system ,both have many symbols taken from the US of A .


          But in fact they are of course complex organizations with a wide variety in membership .Some are ruthless powerhungry types,other the willing executioners of said powerhungry types ,some just go along with it because of the semblance of normality they provide ,some are idealists really trying to piece it together ,some have no choice .But most people dont care wether or not its one or the other as they dont differ much as far as the man in the debris strewn street is concerned .

          I have them down as sometimes warring ,sometimes in talks and as franchises that extend invites to any organized area to join and submit to their charter in return for their support .The leaderships may be at odds with eachother but sometimes the two sides have gotten a hold on an area by random events -and two neighbouring towns are not likely to start a fight over who sits at what desk 1000 miles away -they are fighting over stuff like water supply and farmland -if they are fighting at all .

          Sheer distance and lack of comms and the ensuing misunderstandings would probably be the main reason for "secession" or independence for some areas .But for the elites /on the top having someone backing your legitimacy might be a major concern causing some violence to take place .

          The split is useful though , as it allows for the players to exploit the chaos and carve out areas under their own control .

          We have played a "warlord " type campaign and there have been diplomacy ,alliances,treason,warcrimes indictments,civil wars etc etc as well as the squad type action .But there has never been just the 2 sides competeing .Loads of other local organizations have butted in .As in my view ,the end of the world as we know it would have a lot of people acting on their own .Many would claim legitimacy by calling on dead or at least knocked out institutions like the former goverments etc .

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Legbreaker
            My understanding is that both Civgov and Milgov see themselves as the rightful, legal and only real government of the USA. Therefore, any move away from even symbols of that would be avoided at all costs.
            I agree with everything in Legbreaker's post. Matter of fact I find myself agreeing with most things that Legbreaker posts.
            sigpic "It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Mohoender
              By the way, Grae, I'm not sure about the meaning of your last sentence. This is a game and this is game subject only. If you are getting touchy even on that, I'm not sure to see the point of keeping that community togethere. This time I'm the one complaining, but people getting touchy on everything and anything start to be a itching my back a little too much around here. Give us a break!!

              Ok I have done my part but most of these post have nothing to do with personnal, cultural or national attacks. Actually, I don't even think that anyone ever made such attack.
              Actually my remark was in game context, or ment to be. As you noted the Bonnie Blue was risen at least three time in the history of the US. But it would still be offensive to some for it to be used, at least if they got an inkling as to what/who was really behind it.

              As for any attacks, if I came across that way... oh well that's me, but it was not intended for a personal attack of any sorts. <edit firebrand>

              Grae

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Graebarde
                As for any attacks, if I came across that way... oh well that's me, but it was not intended for a personal attack of any sorts. <edit firebrand>

                Grae
                I didn't see anything you said as an attack. Just a statement that flags can evoke passion, so any adjustment by forces in game could enrage as well as unite a populace.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Graebarde
                  Actually my remark was in game context, or ment to be. As you noted the Bonnie Blue was risen at least three time in the history of the US. But it would still be offensive to some for it to be used, at least if they got an inkling as to what/who was really behind it.

                  As for any attacks, if I came across that way... oh well that's me, but it was not intended for a personal attack of any sorts. <edit firebrand>

                  Grae
                  So it seemed I overreacted a bit..., too much may be (I must have been tired and a bit touchy myself ). Sorry about that . Let's call that battle fatigue.

                  Now I see your point and, in Game terms, I thought of it exactly for the reason you gave. Acutally, what you said made me rethink of it nevertheless, and I would expect NA to use a flag that would be inspired by it but that would be different, nevertheless (may be reverse colors).

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Mohoender View Post
                    So it seemed I overreacted a bit..., too much may be (I must have been tired and a bit touchy myself ). Sorry about that . Let's call that battle fatigue.

                    Now I see your point and, in Game terms, I thought of it exactly for the reason you gave. Acutally, what you said made me rethink of it nevertheless, and I would expect NA to use a flag that would be inspired by it but that would be different, nevertheless (may be reverse colors).
                    From memory there is an NA armband on the cover of one of the modules - Urban Guerilla

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Excerpt from my history:

                      The flags of the Second US Civil War

                      As the civil war between CIVGOV and MILGOV started both sides were still using the US flag. Neither side was willing however to cede the use of this to the other by adopting a new flag (and thus seem to infer legitimacy on them). With both sides using identical uniforms and equipment this lead to a large number of blue-on-blue incidents. The result of this was the reluctance of units to fire upon each other without a positive identification usually based upon the unit insignia (which was only visible at short distances).

                      Occasionally MILGOV forces would be seen with a flag based upon the US Army pattern. More often the presidential seal on a blue background would be found used by CIVGOV although this was not common.

                      MILGOV did issue a brassard for militia units (who were without uniform) which had the wording oeMILGOV Local Forces (although the lettering and occasionally the wording was subject to variation) many existing examples incorporated the US flag at the top. Despite stories stating that a similar brassard was created by CIVGOV, no genuine example has yet surfaced with all the existing ones being either post-war fakes or of unknown origin.

                      New America issued an arm band (as they too were commonly wearing standard US Army equipment), this consisted of a single white star on a background of a red stripe above a blue stripe. Few variations of this are known to exist.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Excerpt from my history:

                        The flags of the Second US Civil War

                        As the civil war between CIVGOV and MILGOV started both sides were still using the US flag. Neither side was willing however to cede the use of this to the other by adopting a new flag (and thus seem to infer legitimacy on them). With both sides using identical uniforms and equipment this lead to a large number of blue-on-blue incidents. The result of this was the reluctance of units to fire upon each other without a positive identification usually based upon the unit insignia (which was only visible at short distances).

                        Occasionally MILGOV forces would be seen with a flag based upon the US Army pattern. More often the presidential seal on a blue background would be found used by CIVGOV although this was not common.

                        MILGOV did issue a brassard for militia units (who were without uniform) which had the wording oeMILGOV Local Forces (although the lettering and occasionally the wording was subject to variation) many existing examples incorporated the US flag at the top. Despite stories stating that a similar brassard was created by CIVGOV, no genuine example has yet surfaced with all the existing ones being either post-war fakes or of unknown origin.

                        New America issued an arm band (as they too were commonly wearing standard US Army equipment), this consisted of a single white star on a background of a red stripe above a blue stripe. Few variations of this are known to exist.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I support that statement 100%.
                          Why would either side give up even the smallest sign of their supposed legitimacy
                          For propaganda reasons NA may look at something different, but it would likely be only a small variation on the theme and possibly incorporate elements from Canada (given NA doesn't seem to recognise that border). NA may also reduce the number of state stars on the flag also given they don't incorporate Hawaii into their "national ideal". As an organisation though the white star and red and blue stripes would remain their official insignia.
                          If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

                          Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

                          Mors ante pudorem

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Little stars for US States and Maple Leaves for Canadian ones, that would look really cute.

                            Although I doubt if cuteness was high on NA's priority list.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Never paid that much attention to New America...do they recognise Canada as a separate nation subordinate to the US or do they think that it should be part of some sort of "Greater United States"

                              If the latter then unlikely to see them adopting any sort of Canadian symbols imho...

                              There was an episode of Jericho where the flag of one of the various groups was seen...iirc the stripes were running vertically rather than horizontally and reference was made to the fact that it signified that it referred to the same original thirteen colonies but that they were now moving in a different direction...words to that effect...that strikes me as a plausible rationale for a group like New America...
                              Last edited by Rainbow Six; 08-25-2011, 05:46 AM. Reason: Added Jericho snippet
                              Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Rainbow Six View Post
                                Never paid that much attention to New America...do they recognise Canada as a separate nation subordinate to the US or do they think that it should be part of some sort of "Greater United States"
                                My understanding of New America is that they would see Canada as rightfully belonging to the US.

                                Originally posted by Rainbow Six View Post
                                There was an episode of Jericho where the flag of one of the various groups was seen...iirc the stripes were running vertically rather than horizontally and reference was made to the fact that it signified that it referred to the same original thirteen colonies but that they were now moving in a different direction...words to that effect...that strikes me as a plausible rationale for a group like New America...
                                I like that so much that Im going to adopt the idea for my own use.

                                There was a thread on New America and its possibilities a while back. I havent made any progress on my flagship New America concept, The Final Solution, in some time. Ive been busy with school work and a new Thunder Empire piece. But I think Ill combine the thirteen vertical stripes idea with a neo-Nazi symbol for the Idaho cell of New America.
                                Last edited by Webstral; 08-25-2011, 05:32 PM. Reason: Italics
                                “We’re not innovating. We’re selectively imitating.” June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X