Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What to do with the dead (Split from Cemeteries in T2K)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Legbreaker
    Theres a problem with mass graves.
    They take a hell of a lot of manpower, fuel and or time to dig.
    It takes some motivated people, a hell of a time, and some kind of motivation for the guys doing the job: either higher pay or threat of their own death. I think that the higher pay would be the best way to achieve that. Mass Graves were used to burry corps during the great plague

    However, I found something interesting that we entirely forgot. That was a common way of getting rid of the corps during the great epidemics of the Middle Ages, and I'm sure that this will be used again: You let the raven do the job for you. Then, I never thought of this but raven's population might be growing tremendously in T2K.

    Comment


    • #17
      A creative idea for mass graves...

      Why not use them to mark your outer perimeter...a 20 foot wide ditch filled with decaying bodies is sure to make the average refugee or marauder question is this is such a good idea.

      My group came up with this last night....they will use a ditch line across parts of Jersey to keep people from crossing and on any bridge they dont want access to.

      Walking across a 1000m bridge stacked 3 deep with bodies will have a similar effect.

      Of course, smell is an issue. How far can you smell a pile of dead bodies
      "Oh yes, I WOOT!"
      TheDarkProphet

      Comment


      • #18
        You can smell dead bodies pretty far in warmer weather. And you are going to dig a trench Mass grave.


        I suggested in the cemetary string,

        Abandoned mine shafts or caves or holes, even abandoned wells. Basements and cellars of old demolished buildings, sewers, turning them into a sort of crypt. As Grae said buildings that are ruined and then just burn them, a small gully or depression is good, all you have to do is cover it.

        At sea or at lake if its a LARGE body of water, just make sure you put them in a proper container and weight. This was done after the Super Huricane that devestated Galveston in the 1920s. They took the bodies out to sea and dumped them. However, they were not tied to weights, so many came back on the tide.

        If you have a large enough flowing river, send them down stream and let someone else worry about it. Although this could contaminate your water supply.

        Those are the only quick and easy options I can think of.

        Where it is practical to dig a mass trench style grave in my view would be in a sandy desert where the digging is easy, or in a arctic enviroment where it never melts, although this could be difficult as well. Another fairly easy way is to burry them in rocks, it is easier than digging and a bit quicker.


        Or, build a wooden platform and leave them like the early native american custom and as they do in india. Just wrap them and put them on a platform exposed to the elements.

        Burning could be easier if you had a good supply of say grass or reeds you could make bundles and continuously place bundles of them for fuel. When you have the platform filled with people you light it and have a mass burning. The downside, will it be enough to burn the remains
        "God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."

        Comment


        • #19
          Your kinda missing my point...

          If people dont want to exert the energy for mass graves...just stack them up on a bridge or across some county line to deter people from crossing into your territory. Two birds..one body.

          As for the actual need for mass graves, I dont see much of a need normally. You wont find hundreds of people dead in the same spot often. Maybe a large group of refugees

          But they would most likely be strung out over a few miles...so unless its across your pasture, who cares

          In a more urban environment, if people start dieing off, most likely from lack of food, most people will move to another location rather then just sitting down and dieing. Again, another location means who cares
          "Oh yes, I WOOT!"
          TheDarkProphet

          Comment


          • #20
            Okay Vlad the Impaler

            One problem with that is disease, as well as the wicked smell that will make you wretch. And imagine the clouds of flies and of course attracting vermin and predators that will develope a taste for human flesh. That is what is dangerous when animals start to look at people as a food source rather than looking at them with fear. Alot of dangers doing it that way.
            "God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."

            Comment


            • #21
              Just had a thought of what to do with several marauder bodies if you only have a few AP mines. You plant the mines and drop the bodies on top of them using ropes from a distance. Then you put up a few "Danger Minefield" signs. If people see mine damaged bodies next to little explosive craters, that is going to go a lot further than a few signs alone would, if you wanted to create a fake minefield.

              Comment


              • #22
                Military units will still have some kind of Graves Registration (even if it's only a few people in the unit), so they will treat their own dead with care and respect, but they won't share that concern for enemy dead. Units in cantonment will most likely have their own cemetery, and outside the cantonment, there will be a mass grave (dug with POW labor) for enemy KIAs. Captured marauders can also be put to such tasks, saving some room for themselves (if they're not used as "indentured laborers"), as it's very likely that they'll be either hanged or shot for their many misdeeds, if not now, once their labor usefulness is ended.
                Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect, but always have a plan to kill them.

                Old USMC Adage

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Graebarde
                  Soap making Well you need lye or the equivalent to make. The old method was wood ashes. If you have wood for fire, you could cremate the cadaver But I'd go for that one probabley in theroy if not in practice. At least not in the current mind set.

                  Compost.. Meat does NOT compost well and takes a relative long time compared to plants. The large bones would have to be fired to turn into the useable minerals too I think. A very LONG term solution as well as smelly. You're in theroy still burying them.

                  NO on feeding the pigs. Hogs are suseptable to many/most of the disease and parasites humans are. IF you contaminate the food source it WILL come back and bite you. Now IF the community is that depraved, I can see them eating 'long pork' directly, and instead of making soap they make soup.
                  Plus the use of humans as food could open up another can of worms,
                  the human equivalent of "Mad Cow Disease" or it is sometimes known as Crutzfield-Jakob's Syndome, IIRC.

                  I think you'd most likely see mass graves and if there is fuel to run them, mostly likely steam shovels, backhoes and bulldozers would be used.

                  Chuck
                  Slave to 1 cat.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Nowhere Man 1966
                    Plus the use of humans as food could open up another can of worms, the human equivalent of "Mad Cow Disease" or it is sometimes known as Crutzfield-Jakob's Syndome, IIRC.
                    There is no such risk. You are right that a similar disease existed among canibals in Papua New Guinea (it is named "Kuru") but that was never due to eating human flesh. It was the result of populations eating human brains and viscera: warriors eating brains and women eating viscera (actually women developped it more often than men).

                    From what I know it was studied by an Australian scientist (If the Australians around can give him the proper credit please, I don't recall his name) who actually warned the western world about Creutzfeld-Jacobs long before the disease induce by cow appeared.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Mohoender
                      There is no such risk. You are right that a similar disease existed among canibals in Papua New Guinea (it is named "Kuru") but that was never due to eating human flesh. It was the result of populations eating human brains and viscera: warriors eating brains and women eating viscera (actually women developped it more often than men).

                      From what I know it was studied by an Australian scientist (If the Australians around can give him the proper credit please, I don't recall his name) who actually warned the western world about Creutzfeld-Jacobs long before the disease induce by cow appeared.
                      That's true, I forgot about the brain matter being the harbor of Mad Cow/CJ.

                      Chuck
                      Slave to 1 cat.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Damn Mo! I thought I was the only one who used Kuru over Jabob Crutchfields disease! For the same reason you stated.

                        I would also note that, it is not just brain matter but ALL nerve tissue, but mostly brains and spinal tissue.

                        But that also brings up another issue.

                        Not just mad cow disease, but also any number of other other livestock diseases that could either be passed to humans.


                        And of course we could have,

                        SOILENT GREEN!!!!!!
                        "God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I came across it a few years ago because of a TV report on it. Then, I became curious.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Mohoender
                            I came across it a few years ago because of a TV report on it. Then, I became curious.

                            Oh, we studied it in anthropology class in college. One woman an older one even discussed how they used to skin and dress their meals.
                            "God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              It's a Bug's Life (or Death)

                              Along the same path as the Towers of Silence, anyone who can breed enough beetles of the appropriate kind, put the body (bodies) in a large impermeable container, bathtub with a metal screen covering, burial vault, and let the beetles do their thing. Maggots are also handy for this but not as effective and will become flies eventually. One option open to our Southron brethren, are fire ants. A buckskinning associate of mine tells me he cleans deer skulls and other game skeletons by placing the object on/near a fire ant mound, then coming back in a day or so. (see, they're good for _something_).

                              When all the feasting has been completed, remove the polished bones from the container, dry and pulverize for garden bone meal.
                              "Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X