Would you want the bs that they have in the canon.
From memory their was an Corps HQ, remains of the 10th Mountain Division, and the remains of the 1st and 2nd Artic Recon Brigade were the US Army units there. That all of which I can remember at this time.
Now realistically, the 6th Light Infantry would of never left up there for Germany, maybe for Korea, but not for Germany. With being so close to the Soviet Union this unit would of more than likely, stay in place as a reaction force.
If memory serves, the Soviets have an entire corps isolated at Anchorage. I don't have the impression that Allied forces (US and maybe some Canadians) actually have the Soviets under siege at Anchorage in late 2000. I think the sheer distances involved in Alaska and the chaotic state of the world have more to do with the isolation of the Soviets in Anchorage than any action by Americans. Juneau is supposedly under control of US forces, for whatever that is worth. There are some Soviets isolated along the coast of British Columbia, too.
Webstral
“We’re not innovating. We’re selectively imitating.” June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998.
If memory serves, the Soviets have an entire corps isolated at Anchorage. I don't have the impression that Allied forces (US and maybe some Canadians) actually have the Soviets under siege at Anchorage in late 2000. I think the sheer distances involved in Alaska and the chaotic state of the world have more to do with the isolation of the Soviets in Anchorage than any action by Americans. Juneau is supposedly under control of US forces, for whatever that is worth. There are some Soviets isolated along the coast of British Columbia, too.
Webstral
The US Army only had only one under size Corps in Alaska, and they were spread out.
U should talk to HQ if you wan't his "alternative" sollution to Alaska.
(personally I think it's pretty good)
If memory serves me right:
CIVGOV forces in the oilproducing areas in the north
MILGOV forces in the south
TSARIST/RUSSIAN forces in the south
LOCAL SEPERATISTS or ANARCHY in the rest
Our reasoning: 6th ID ends up in Germany via way of Norway in canon. It goes to Norway in spring 97 as reinforcements for the drive on Murmansk. 47th ID, composed of troops from the northern Midwest who are more used to the cold than average Americans, takes over the role of defense of Alaska from the 6th. 11th Airborne is training up during the TDM and is brought into Alaska as emergency reinforcements. It is understrength in troops and equipment. The 172nd IB is a test & evaluation unit to try the new hovercraft, described in the v2 US Army Vehicle Guide. It was not originally roled to have a primary combat role - it's role was similar to the 9th ID in the mid 80s when the Army was trying different light motorized concepts. (Yes, I realize that one of the brigades of 6th ID assumed the lineage & honors of the 172nd, so there will have to be a little reflagging/redesignation in the 6th ID, but its largely irrelevant for our purposes).
USAF Alaska Air Command has the 343rd Tactical Fighter Wing flying A-10s out of Eilson AFB (18th Tactical Fighter Sqn, 11th & 25th Tactical Air Support Sqns), the 21st Tactical Fighter Wing flying F-15s from Elmendorf, Galena & King Salmon (43rd & 54th Tactical Fighter Sqns), the 616th Tactical Airlift Wing flying C-130s & C-12s from Elmendorf (17th Tactical Airlift Squadron), and the 962nd Airborne Command & Control Squadron with 3 E-3s flying air control missions. Additional tactical, strategic & airlift forces would also be found transiting Alaska (it's on the great circle route from the Pacific NW to Korea and a great jumping off & early landing spot for bomber raids over the Arctic and into Siberia).
We haven't finalized the Canadians yet.
On the Soviet side, the Aluetian Front deploys the 51st Army (which really has a tough mission - defense of the area from the Kuriles to the shores of the Arctic Ocean). It splits off the 25th Army Corps (Petropavlovsk-Kamchatka) for the Alaska op.
It has (and this orbat isn't finalized yet, there may likely be more independent regiments and brigades):
We haven't determined yet what reinforcements it may get, from within the Far Eastern TVD or from the high command's reserves. Likely there will be some airborne or air assault units and possibly the Pacific Fleet's 55th Naval Infantry Division:
On the attack air side, things are less defined - Far Eastern TVD has been in action for almost 2 years nonstop by the time the Alaska operation kicks off, and the augmentees from the rest of the USSR returned to their home bases when war broke out in the west.
Tactical air would come from the 1st Air Army in Khabarovsk: (starting locations are here, what their location & condition is by the time the Alaska op kicks off hasn't been worked out yet).
Long range transports from the 14th Transport Division (Aeroflot), from Irkutsk:
-1st MVD Transport Regiment (50 IL-76MD)
-1st Aeroflot Transport Regiment (45 IL-76M)
-3rd Aeroflot Transport Regiment (45 IL-76MD)
There could also be long-range bombers from both Long Range Aviation (equivalent to SAC) or Naval Aviation available.
On the naval side, not much in the way of combatants. The Pacific Fleet dies fairly early in the war, and the remnants of the surface fleet are penned up in Petropovlovsk and Vladivostok. The Alaska op is mounted with a breakout of hundreds of fishing trawlers from Petropovlosk (to get through the minefields laid by the US), and suffers greatly from the interdiction of one of the US battleships. We'll work out more details when we get farther along with our work.
As always, you are free to use or discard this as you choose!
I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end...
Is the airborne battalion of the 172nd a new battalion Just asking since the 6th ID, much like the 7th ID, and 10th Mountain had never reach their authorized strengths. All of them would have to round out brigade. So you moving a Division with 2 Brigades and sending it Norway. With the position that the Division was in, I have always found it hard to send thing unit half-way across the world, to only bring in another unit who has to learn everything fresh, of course they are from Minnesota and like so they will be ahead of the learning curve. Especially when you consider the 10th Mountain Division is in the same shape, and seem more of a logical choice to move to Norway, it is closer, and not in area that is easily access by Soviet forces.
Is the airborne battalion of the 172nd a new battalion Just asking since the 6th ID, much like the 7th ID, and 10th Mountain had never reach their authorized strengths. All of them would have to round out brigade. So you moving a Division with 2 Brigades and sending it Norway. With the position that the Division was in, I have always found it hard to send thing unit half-way across the world, to only bring in another unit who has to learn everything fresh, of course they are from Minnesota and like so they will be ahead of the learning curve. Especially when you consider the 10th Mountain Division is in the same shape, and seem more of a logical choice to move to Norway, it is closer, and not in area that is easily access by Soviet forces.
It's a new airborne battalion.
In our writeup for the buildup of the US Army before the war, we brought the 6th & 10th Divisions up to 3 brigades each. This was a result of the perception after Desert Storm that the Guard round-out brigade concept didn't work - that the Round Out units were unable to be maintained at the proper readiness to be able to deploy at essentially a moment's notice. Therefore, 6th, 10th & 24th ID's stood up new active-duty brigades, while the former round out brigades were used in some of the polygot divisions formed in 1996 and 1997, or, in the case of the 48th IB, deployed as an independent brigade. 5th ID & 1st Cav retained their roundout brigades because there was not enough equipment to stand up new brigades, and the war came before the new active-duty brigades could be formed (their cadres eventually formed the new 4th AD, which was at NTC and similar facilities during the TDM and never deployed outside CONUS).
We have 10th Mountain deploying to Norway in the fall of 1996 and 6th coming the next Spring. IMHO it makes sense to move a National Guard unit, with its (at least perceived, if not real) lower level of readiness & standard of equipment, to a defensive mission in the US than to send it overseas for an offensive mission. In fact, we might write it up as the 47th was sent to Alaska after the outbreak of war and spent the winter doing Arctic training, acting as OPFOR for the 172nd's now-frantic doctrinal development exercises, and reinforcing 6th ID. When the situation in Norway got to the point that another division was needed, the commanders in Alaska agreed that 6th ID was the more ready and sent it. The decision to pull troops out of Alaska was taken in a global context - the need for more troops in Norway for the Murmansk offensive, the mistaken belief that the global nature of the war at that point (Norway, Poland, Balkans, Iran, China, Korea) made it unlikely that the Soviets would open a new front in Alaska, the growing strength & competence of the 172nd, all pointed to the conclusion that maintaining what was effectively a full strength corps in Alaska was not the effective use of the available troops. Mitigating that risk too was the growing strength of the 11th and 17th Airborne Divisions, which could (and the 11th was) flown in at short notice to reinforce US Army Alaska in an emergency.
I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end...
This would be right about the time that Antenna would be kicking me in the butt if he visited here much. I put a little work into, but not enough, an Alaska Sourcebook since I lived up there for so many years. I had previously collected the information for the units that Twilight had up there. There wasn't much for the American. None for Canada, and a mess of units from the Soviets, but they got around the strength discrepancies by having several units from the USSR defect and either go rogue or join NATO's side.
Basically, for America you've got:
10th Infantry Division
1st Infantry Brigade (Arctic Recon)
2nd Infantry Brigade (Arctic Recon)
That's it.
You had, at one time, in Alaska:
the 104th Infantry Division (Light) but now it's in the Montana-Idaho region
the 47th Infantry Division but now it's in the Washington-Oregon region
The Soviets, on the other hand, had:
7th Motorized Rifle Division
41st Motorized Rifle Division
14th Motorized Rifle Division
113th Motorized Rifle Division
147th Motorized Rifle Division
1st Arctic Mechanized Brigade
2nd Arctic Mechanized Brigade
1st Naval Infantry Brigade
18th Hovercraft Transport Regiment
In the "general area" is:
62nd Motorized Rifle Division - in British Columbia
114th Motorized Rifle Division - in Whitehorse - Yukon, Canada
120th Motorized Rifle Division - on Queen Charlotte Island (riiiiight), British Columbia
And was in Alaska at one time:
6th Guards Air Assault Division
Now they tried to change this enormous offset of forces by having both the 41st and 14th MRD change sides to NATO. They're supposedly in the Juneau region. (yeah....riiiiiight)
But that's what the books say. While I could see some of those units being in Alaska, I'm pretty sure that if they all were, Alaska wouldn't be in the hands of the Americans. Especially not with the forces the American had there.
Now realistically, there'd be a lot of local militia, a sizable contingent of Coast Guard, and the Air Forces available for the Americans. Plus I'm pretty sure there would be some Canadian forces involved as well.
Contribute to the Twilight: 2000 fanzine - "Good Luck, You're On Your Own". Send submissions to: Twilightgrimace@gmail.com
In all seriousness, the logistical situation could be used to explain the otherwise inexplicable pattern in Alaska and the Pacific Northwest. The Soviets who have been cut off in Anchorage don't have the force of numbers one might think if they are out of ammunition, spare parts, fuel, etc. It doesn't take a lot of men with high-powered rifles to make passage through mountainous and forested areas too difficult to contemplate for an infantry-based force accustomed to fighting with AFV support. Again, the sheer distances involved in the Pacific Northwest might be the best defense the Allies have. The US forces at Fairbanks, limited though they are, probably have the enthusiastic support of the local population. The Soviets will have whatever support they can squeeze out of the locals. This makes a big difference.
After a certain time, the Soviets are going to be a lot more worried about securing enough food than about pressing an offensive for Mother Russia. Let's face it: Mother Russia hung them out to dry. It won't take long for the average rifleman to figure that out. Once that happens, morale will go into the toilet. Once that happens, it won't take much to put a stopper in any Soviet offensive action out of Anchorage cantonment. Although the ratio of forces might suggest, on the surface, total domination by the Soviets, I think there is a LOT more to the picture.
Webstral
“We’re not innovating. We’re selectively imitating.” June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998.
Well, truth be told, the Soviets hold the bread-basket of Alaska by holding the Anchorage area. Not only do they have access to port facilities, but they've got rivers that have fairly large salmon runs each year, AND they have the Matanuska Valley for growing their own foods. So food isn't necessarily one of their problems.
The range...distance...that constitutes Alaska probably has a large part to do with their lack of desire to make a push out of the Anchorage area. Where would they go to North to Fairbanks to gain what East into Canada to gain what East to Canada to drive a really long distance south and into a well defended main body of the U.S. Any of those options takes them away from the resources they have, away from port facilities where they still might get a meager trickle of supplies (if any), and puts them across not only vast distances where they have to expend precious fuel, but also into terrain not suitable for a lot of offensive actions.
The funny part is, as hard as it would be to fight their way out of the Anchorage area, at the same time it's equally hard for the U.S. forces to keep the Soviets hemmed in there. Sure they could have the passes covered during the summer. But come winter time, maintaining those chokepoints is going to get harder and harder. Without supplies coming in through Anchorage and any place on the Kenai Peninsula, everything would have to come up via the very long land route, or by plane. Both would be something that would get less and less common as the war went on. Places like Fairbanks, while having a great military base, would be without food and fuel in a very short time and would need everything shipped in from a very, very long way away.
So yes, while it might be hard for the Soviets, it would be even tougher on the Americans trying to hold the Soviets in.
Contribute to the Twilight: 2000 fanzine - "Good Luck, You're On Your Own". Send submissions to: Twilightgrimace@gmail.com
Comment