Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Best That Never Was 2 (Prototypes)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by rcaf_777 View Post
    M60-2000 Main Battle Tank or 120S made by General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M60-2000_Main_Battle_Tank
    I see someone lifted that from the Red Dawn fiction page!
    Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect, but always have a plan to kill them.

    Old USMC Adage

    Comment


    • M975 Roland

      While the Roland SAM is an actual weapon system used by the French and few others. It was a one time consider as US Army SAM system mounted on an M109 chassis (see below), while this system was not picked up, the system was modified by the USAF and used as a training tool for anti SAM training. Which is the second picture of the system mounted on a truck.
      Attached Files
      I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by rcaf_777 View Post
        While the Roland SAM is an actual weapon system used by the French and few others. It was a one time consider as US Army SAM system mounted on an M109 chassis (see below), while this system was not picked up, the system was modified by the USAF and used as a training tool for anti SAM training. Which is the second picture of the system mounted on a truck.
        French system, eh Would be tricky trying to get reloads from the French post-whoops without selling your soul.
        "Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001.

        Comment


        • Franco-German actually, the US had plans to make the missile in the US like many other foreign weapons systems

          If this system was used by the US that would mean that three NATO countries would have been using it

          I don't France would say no to money during the conflict
          I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by rcaf_777 View Post
            Franco-German actually, the US had plans to make the missile in the US like many other foreign weapons systems

            If this system was used by the US that would mean that three NATO countries would have been using it

            I don't France would say no to money during the conflict
            Considering France is in deep isolation, with a few concentrated force abroad, Im not sure money is really what they would want... But we don't know for sure because there's no damn french source book 😣😭

            Comment


            • The West German forces used the Roland on a Marder chassis as well as shelter versions mounted on MAN 6x6 & 8x8 trucks and while it was a joint French-German project, West Germany was the lead partner for the all weather version (France being the lead for the day/clear weather version.
              The Germans had the system in service before 1980 (I think it was 1977 or 1978).

              So there would be a potential supply line in Germany and as mentioned, the US was going to produce the missile domestically if the system had been taken into service. I think it would be easy enough to justify the system going into US service with the increasing tensions during the build-up to the Twilight War including producing the missiles in the US.

              However... Spain also used the day/clear-weather version on the AMX-30 chassis (like the French). While I don't know of any missile production in Spain, it's a potential resupply for the fair-weather missile albeit in limited numbers.
              And the other interesting bit of information, in relation to the US, is that Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela all acquired the system (but in tiny numbers although Brazil did get the Marder version while the other two got shelter versions). I don't recall when these countries purchased the Roland but I believe it was no later than the 1980s (considering that British forces captured one Argentine example during the Falklands War in 1982).

              Comment


              • Originally posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
                The West German forces used the Roland on a Marder chassis as well as shelter versions mounted on MAN 6x6 & 8x8 trucks and while it was a joint French-German project, West Germany was the lead partner for the all weather version (France being the lead for the day/clear weather version.
                The Germans had the system in service before 1980 (I think it was 1977 or 1978).
                1978, with the Roland II (the Roland I was the French clear-weather-only version, which entered service in 1977).

                So there would be a potential supply line in Germany and as mentioned, the US was going to produce the missile domestically if the system had been taken into service. I think it would be easy enough to justify the system going into US service with the increasing tensions during the build-up to the Twilight War including producing the missiles in the US.

                However... Spain also used the day/clear-weather version on the AMX-30 chassis (like the French). While I don't know of any missile production in Spain, it's a potential resupply for the fair-weather missile albeit in limited numbers.
                And the other interesting bit of information, in relation to the US, is that Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela all acquired the system (but in tiny numbers although Brazil did get the Marder version while the other two got shelter versions). I don't recall when these countries purchased the Roland but I believe it was no later than the 1980s (considering that British forces captured one Argentine example during the Falklands War in 1982).
                Spain license-manufactured 18 AMX-30R, 9 each of the Roland 1 and Roland 2, and purchased 414 missiles. 8 of each system were deployed with 1 in reserve, forming 2 batteries each of 2 Roland 1 and 2 Roland 2. The procurement was announced in April 1984. They may have made missile spares, but I don't believe they built entire missiles.

                Nigeria acquired 16 Roland 2/AMX-30R, and Qatar ordered 3 in 1986 that were delivered in 1989.

                Argentina acquired the Roland "shortly before the outbreak of hostilities," according to Making and Marketing Arms, and they were still waiting for delivery of some missiles when the Falklands War began.

                Brazil purchased 4 systems and 50 missiles. The order was placed in 1975, but I don't have a definite year for delivery.

                Venezuela acquired 6 or 8 (reports vary) shelter units in 1985.

                Iraq was a large user; they mounted 100 shelter units on MAN 8x8 trucks as mobile launchers, and also had 13 AMX-30R launchers, with deliveries early enough that some were in active service by 1982. Based on an analysis of Desert Shield/Desert Storm, it looks like the AMX-30R systems were Roland I and the shelter units were Roland II.
                Writer at The Vespers War - World War I equipment for v2.2

                Comment


                • Licenced maufacturing

                  In the 70s through the 90s, several vehicle systems were produced overseas by NATO allies.
                  The M-60 was produced in Ialy by OTO Melara, as was, IIRC the M-47 and the M-113.
                  The Netherlands worked with the M-113 , reconfiguring it to be a m ore effective battle taxi.
                  West Germany produced the M-47 and the M-48 prior to adopting the home-grown Leopard.
                  India was licensed to manufacture a copy of the105mm-armed Vickers Mk.1 called Vijayanta
                  "Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001.

                  Comment


                  • This one was a failed competitor in the DIVAD competition (which gave us that POS known as the SGT York). Entered by General Electric, it's an M-48 hull with new turret for radar and a GAU-8 30-mm cannon (same as in the A-10).
                    Attached Files
                    Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect, but always have a plan to kill them.

                    Old USMC Adage

                    Comment


                    • I get that they wanted to make use of available vehicle parts, off the shelf tech and so on but I still shake my head over the Sgt York.
                      I can't get over the idea that they thought it was a good idea to base the system on a vehicle (the M48) that had been phased out of service and a vehicle that couldn't keep up with the tanks it was meant to protect.

                      Edit: If they were so intent on using a twin 40mm set-up, they probably would have been better off upgrading the M42 Duster to the latest tech and all-weather performance. At least the M42 had the speed to keep up with the M1.
                      Last edited by StainlessSteelCynic; 02-11-2018, 01:27 AM. Reason: adding some thoughts

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Matt Wiser View Post
                        This one was a failed competitor in the DIVAD competition (which gave us that POS known as the SGT York). Entered by General Electric, it's an M-48 hull with new turret for radar and a GAU-8 30-mm cannon (same as in the A-10).
                        Now I know that it never did make it into full production and all that but I am not sure that I would go so far as to cal the Sgt York a POS, here is a link to an article from a pilot involved in the testing of it and his thoughts on it.
                        Answer (1 of 2): In 1982 I participated in both cooperative and non-cooperative tests at Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland, flying an Air Force CH-3E helicopter against a Sergeant York. I would have been dead many times over had it been shooting live rounds at us instead of just video. The S...

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by CDAT View Post
                          Now I know that it never did make it into full production and all that but I am not sure that I would go so far as to cal the Sgt York a POS, here is a link to an article from a pilot involved in the testing of it and his thoughts on it.
                          https://www.quora.com/How-effective-...wn-helicopters
                          The criteria in its design were flawed. It was supposed to be able to engage a pop-up target within 8 seconds and have a 50% chance of striking a target at 3 kilometers with a 30 round burst. Soviet helicopter-mounted anti-tank missiles of the time had at least a 6 kilometer range, so they could stand off and destroy an armored column from outside the York's (marginally) effective range.

                          I'd also question the anecdote of its effectiveness, given that in its OT&E testing in 1984, the M247 wasn't able to hit drones until they were limited to hovering and were carrying four radar reflectors to increase their signature. Maybe it worked perfectly in every non-official test and failed miserably any time someone was looking, but I'll tend to lean towards the side of the recorded testing, because anecdote is not the singular of data.

                          Originally posted by StainlessSteelCynic
                          Edit: If they were so intent on using a twin 40mm set-up, they probably would have been better off upgrading the M42 Duster to the latest tech and all-weather performance. At least the M42 had the speed to keep up with the M1.
                          It wouldn't have been able to keep up once the whiz-bang features from DIVAD were added - the additional mass on the Patton (17 tons) was almost equal to the total mass of a Duster (22 tons). Add in the short range of the Duster (100 miles), and you're looking at a slow, short-ranged SPAAG. With the DIVAD weight added, you'd be looking at a vehicle with perhaps 2/3 the power to weight ratio of an M1 or M2, and less than 1/3 of their range. They also weren't insistent on using a 40mm; no other DIVAD entry used that caliber (it's rumored Ford had some sort of side deal with Bofors, and also that they only won the competition because of back room shenanigans, since the XM246 consistently out-performed the XM247).

                          What could be interesting from the standpoint of the original topic would be to look at the other ARGADS/DIVAD entries:
                          Sperry-Rand: 35mm Vigilante with 1,464 rounds of ammo. Two radars and IFF.
                          General Electric: 30mm GAU-8. One radar (AN/MPQ-49).
                          Raytheon: 35mm turret from Gepard, with Hollandse radar and Oerlikon FCS.
                          General Dynamics: Side-by-side mounting of 35mm guns (same as Gepard), with Phalanx CIWS radar.
                          Writer at The Vespers War - World War I equipment for v2.2

                          Comment


                          • Any artists' concepts of those other entries
                            Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect, but always have a plan to kill them.

                            Old USMC Adage

                            Comment


                            • Does this help
                              Attached Files
                              I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier.

                              Comment


                              • 1K17 Szhatie self-propelled laser vehicle

                                Attached Files
                                I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X